PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBFG vs. RACE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBFG vs. RACE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBFG achieves a 19.76% return, which is significantly higher than RACE's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, SBFG has underperformed RACE with an annualized return of 12.11%, while RACE has yielded a comparatively higher 25.01% annualized return.


SBFG

1D
-1.20%
1M
4.78%
6M
16.82%
YTD
19.76%
1Y
42.62%
3Y*
28.21%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.11%
ALL TIME*
4.12%

RACE

1D
-0.97%
1M
2.31%
6M
20.96%
YTD
9.05%
1Y
-7.62%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
25.01%
ALL TIME*
20.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$213.71M$177.89M$215.91M
$532.55K$659.62K$903.78K

SBFG vs. RACE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.
19.76%9.53%41.15%-5.95%-7.04%10.21%-4.73%22.20%-9.50%17.09%
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
9.05%-11.65%26.34%59.12%-16.68%13.32%39.71%67.87%-4.47%81.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SBFG and RACE is 0.18, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2015

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBFG:

$164.91M

RACE:

$69.29B

EPS

SBFG:

$2.68

RACE:

€9.21

PE Ratio

SBFG:

9.82

RACE:

37.14

PS Ratio

SBFG:

1.73

RACE:

8.26

PB Ratio

SBFG:

1.11

RACE:

16.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBFG:

$94.86M

RACE:

€7.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBFG:

$67.53M

RACE:

€3.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

SBFG:

$24.15M

RACE:

€2.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBFG vs. RACE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBFG
SBFG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
SBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

RACE
RACE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
RACE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RACE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RACE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
RACE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RACE Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBFG vs. RACE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBFGRACEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.98

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

-0.24

+2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.42

-0.37

+5.79

SBFG vs. RACE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBFG Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the RACE Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBFG and RACE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBFG vs. RACE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBFG drawdown since its inception was -82.58%, which is greater than RACE's maximum drawdown of -46.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBFG and RACE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBFGRACEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.58%

-46.67%

-35.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.56%

-37.58%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.81%

-39.22%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.65%

-39.22%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.65%

-39.22%

-10.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.99%

-22.14%

+17.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.15%

-11.68%

-14.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.11%

24.83%

-16.72%

Volatility

SBFG vs. RACE - Volatility Comparison

SB Financial Group, Inc. (SBFG) and Ferrari N.V. (RACE) have volatilities of 9.96% and 9.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBFGRACEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.96%

9.87%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.30%

26.32%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.67%

36.83%

-2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.31%

29.99%

+1.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.00%

29.54%

+3.46%

Dividends

SBFG vs. RACE - Dividend Comparison

SBFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than RACE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RACE
Ferrari N.V.
2.16%1.85%0.61%0.59%0.69%0.40%0.54%0.70%0.88%0.61%0.79%0.00%
SBFG
SB Financial Group, Inc.
2.36%2.69%2.68%3.39%2.83%2.24%2.19%1.83%1.95%1.51%1.50%1.80%

Financials

SBFG vs. RACE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SB Financial Group, Inc. and Ferrari N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

SBFG vs. RACE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between SB Financial Group, Inc. and Ferrari N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

SBFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SB Financial Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.64M and revenue of 24.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.1%.

RACE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.6%.

SBFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SB Financial Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.51M and revenue of 24.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

RACE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported an operating income of 612.63M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.7%.

SBFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SB Financial Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.50M and revenue of 24.81M, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.

RACE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ferrari N.V. reported a net income of 461.55M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SBFG and RACE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SBFG has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to RACE (9.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBFG dropped -82.58% vs RACE's -46.67%.

SBFG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBFG and RACE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer