SBET vs. SHV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SBET (SharpLink Gaming Ltd.) is a stock, while SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past year, SBET returned -88.98% vs 3.90% for SHV. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

SBET vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBET achieves a -38.03% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 1.42% return.

SBET

• 1D: -4.65%
• 1M: -26.82%
• YTD: -38.03%
• 6M: -47.69%
• 1Y: -88.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SHV

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.90%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.31%
• 10Y*: 2.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBET vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SBET SharpLink Gaming Ltd.	-38.03%	15.65%	-52.63%
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	1.42%	4.21%	4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between SBET and SHV is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024	-0.07

Return for Risk

SBET vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBET

SBET Risk / Return Rank: 11
SBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
SBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
SBET Omega Ratio Rank: 12
SBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SBET Martin Ratio Rank: 17

SHV

SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBET vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SBET	SHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	19.49	-20.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	149.54	-150.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	53.77	-52.89
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	431.38	-432.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.12	2,419.80	-2,420.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SBET vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBET Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 19.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBET and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SBET	SHV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.62	19.49	-20.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	11.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	8.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	4.50	-4.61

Drawdowns

SBET vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBET drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBET and SHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SBET	SHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.01%	-0.45%	-92.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-90.64%	-0.01%	-90.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-0.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.01%	0.00%	-93.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.70%	-0.03%	-65.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	79.14%	0.00%	+79.14%

Volatility

SBET vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) has a higher volatility of 18.65% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that SBET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SBET	SHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.65%	0.05%	+18.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.20%	0.12%	+56.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	143.78%	0.20%	+143.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	341.43%	0.29%	+341.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	341.43%	0.28%	+341.15%

Dividends

SBET vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

SBET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SBET SharpLink Gaming Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF	3.83%	4.09%	5.02%	4.73%	1.39%	0.00%	0.74%	2.19%	1.66%	0.72%	0.34%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SBET and SHV in my portfolio?

SBET and SHV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SBET or SHV?

SBET has higher volatility (18.65%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBET dropped -93.01% vs SHV's -0.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.