SBET vs. CORZZ
SBET (SharpLink Gaming Ltd.) and CORZZ (Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants) are both stocks. SBET operates in Gambling (Consumer Cyclical), while CORZZ operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, SBET returned -90.34% vs 123.46% for CORZZ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBET vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBET achieves a -36.02% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 92.57% return.
SBET
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- -24.74%
- YTD
- -36.02%
- 6M
- -48.75%
- 1Y
- -90.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CORZZ
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- 25.06%
- YTD
- 92.57%
- 6M
- 63.93%
- 1Y
- 123.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBET vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SBET SharpLink Gaming Ltd. | -36.02% | 15.65% | -52.63% |
CORZZ Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants | 92.57% | 3.71% | 368.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBET and CORZZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024 | 0.14 |
Over the past year, SBET and CORZZ have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SBET:
-$14.63
CORZZ:
-$3.81
SBET:
14.10
CORZZ:
25.21
SBET:
$39.37M
CORZZ:
$354.74M
SBET:
$37.65M
CORZZ:
$59.79M
SBET:
-$504.51M
CORZZ:
$78.17M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBET vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank
SBET
CORZZ
SBET vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.04 | 3.07 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 5.83 | -7.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.64 | 1.70 | -2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 2.41 | -2.52 |
Drawdowns
SBET vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBET drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than CORZZ's maximum drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBET and CORZZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.01% | -65.20% | -27.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.97% | -40.39% | -46.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.78% | -3.78% | -89.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.74% | -21.54% | -44.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 79.34% | 21.25% | +58.09% |
Volatility
SBET vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison
SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) have volatilities of 19.16% and 19.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.16% | 19.89% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.16% | 47.16% | +9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 143.55% | 73.25% | +70.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 341.14% | 97.32% | +243.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 341.14% | 97.32% | +243.82% |
Dividends
SBET vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBET nor CORZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SBET vs. CORZZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SharpLink Gaming Ltd. and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SBET and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORZZ has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to SBET (19.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBET dropped -93.01% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.
CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBET and CORZZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer