PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBET vs. CORZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBET vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sharplink, Inc. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBET achieves a -31.54% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 45.53% return.


SBET

1D
-4.52%
1M
15.25%
6M
-31.08%
YTD
-31.54%
1Y
-64.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-28.88%

CORZZ

1D
-3.29%
1M
-1.03%
6M
17.43%
YTD
45.53%
1Y
67.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
155.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$162.54K$159.83K$552.12K
$53.27M$53.90M$52.48M

SBET vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBET
Sharplink, Inc.
-31.54%15.65%-45.41%
CORZZ
Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants
45.53%3.71%360.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SBET and CORZZ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2024

0.15

Over the past year, SBET and CORZZ have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SBET:

$1.21B

CORZZ:

$6.78B

EPS

SBET:

-$11.70

CORZZ:

-$4.47

PS Ratio

SBET:

18.85

CORZZ:

15.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBET:

$39.37M

CORZZ:

$440.31M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBET:

$37.65M

CORZZ:

$124.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBET:

-$504.51M

CORZZ:

-$1.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBET vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SBET
SBET Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBET Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBET Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CORZZ
CORZZ Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CORZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CORZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SBET vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sharplink, Inc. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SBETCORZZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.18

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

1.40

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

2.81

-3.93

SBET vs. CORZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBET Sharpe Ratio is -0.82, which is lower than the CORZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBET and CORZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SBET vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBET drawdown since its inception was -94.24%, which is greater than CORZZ's maximum drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBET and CORZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBETCORZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.24%

-65.20%

-29.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.94%

-40.39%

-40.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.27%

-27.29%

-64.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.36%

-21.24%

-46.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.25%

20.09%

+40.16%

Volatility

SBET vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sharplink, Inc. (SBET) is 21.90%, while Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) has a volatility of 33.46%. This indicates that SBET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CORZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBETCORZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.90%

33.46%

-11.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.64%

55.51%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.34%

69.94%

+12.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

330.59%

97.80%

+232.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

330.59%

97.80%

+232.79%

Dividends

SBET vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBET nor CORZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SBET vs. CORZZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sharplink, Inc. and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBET and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CORZZ has higher volatility (33.46%) compared to SBET (21.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBET dropped -94.24% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.

CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBET and CORZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer