SBET vs. CORZZ
SBET (Sharplink, Inc.) and CORZZ (Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants) are both stocks. SBET operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while CORZZ operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past year, SBET returned -64.29% vs 67.27% for CORZZ. Their 0.15 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SBET vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBET achieves a -31.54% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 45.53% return.
SBET
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- 15.25%
- 6M
- -31.08%
- YTD
- -31.54%
- 1Y
- -64.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.88%
CORZZ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 17.43%
- YTD
- 45.53%
- 1Y
- 67.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 155.37%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $162.54K | $159.83K | $552.12K | |
SBET Sharplink, Inc. | $53.27M | $53.90M | $52.48M |
SBET vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SBET Sharplink, Inc. | -31.54% | 15.65% | -45.41% |
CORZZ Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants | 45.53% | 3.71% | 360.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBET and CORZZ is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2024 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, SBET and CORZZ have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
SBET:
$1.21B
CORZZ:
$6.78B
SBET:
-$11.70
CORZZ:
-$4.47
SBET:
18.85
CORZZ:
15.44
SBET:
$39.37M
CORZZ:
$440.31M
SBET:
$37.65M
CORZZ:
$124.45M
SBET:
-$504.51M
CORZZ:
-$1.14B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBET vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank
SBET
CORZZ
SBET vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sharplink, Inc. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.18 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 1.40 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 2.81 | -3.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBET vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBET drawdown since its inception was -94.24%, which is greater than CORZZ's maximum drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBET and CORZZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.24% | -65.20% | -29.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.94% | -40.39% | -40.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.27% | -27.29% | -64.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.36% | -21.24% | -46.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.25% | 20.09% | +40.16% |
Volatility
SBET vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sharplink, Inc. (SBET) is 21.90%, while Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) has a volatility of 33.46%. This indicates that SBET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CORZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBET | CORZZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.90% | 33.46% | -11.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.64% | 55.51% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 82.34% | 69.94% | +12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 330.59% | 97.80% | +232.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 330.59% | 97.80% | +232.79% |
Dividends
SBET vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither SBET nor CORZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SBET vs. CORZZ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sharplink, Inc. and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SBET and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CORZZ has higher volatility (33.46%) compared to SBET (21.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBET dropped -94.24% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.
CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SBET and CORZZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer