PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBET vs. CORZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SBET vs. CORZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBET achieves a -36.02% return, which is significantly lower than CORZZ's 92.57% return.


SBET

1D
3.25%
1M
-24.74%
YTD
-36.02%
6M
-48.75%
1Y
-90.34%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CORZZ

1D
-3.78%
1M
25.06%
YTD
92.57%
6M
63.93%
1Y
123.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBET vs. CORZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SBET
SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
-36.02%15.65%-52.63%
CORZZ
Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants
92.57%3.71%368.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SBET and CORZZ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2024

0.14

Over the past year, SBET and CORZZ have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

SBET:

-$14.63

CORZZ:

-$3.81

PS Ratio

SBET:

14.10

CORZZ:

25.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

SBET:

$39.37M

CORZZ:

$354.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SBET:

$37.65M

CORZZ:

$59.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

SBET:

-$504.51M

CORZZ:

$78.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBET vs. CORZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBET
SBET Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SBET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBET Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBET Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SBET Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBET Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

CORZZ
CORZZ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CORZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
CORZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBET vs. CORZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBETCORZZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.30

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.04

3.07

-4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

5.83

-7.09

SBET vs. CORZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBET Sharpe Ratio is -0.64, which is lower than the CORZZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBET and CORZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBETCORZZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.64

1.70

-2.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

2.41

-2.52

Drawdowns

SBET vs. CORZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBET drawdown since its inception was -93.01%, which is greater than CORZZ's maximum drawdown of -65.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBET and CORZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBETCORZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.01%

-65.20%

-27.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-86.97%

-40.39%

-46.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.78%

-3.78%

-89.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.74%

-21.54%

-44.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

79.34%

21.25%

+58.09%

Volatility

SBET vs. CORZZ - Volatility Comparison

SharpLink Gaming Ltd. (SBET) and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants (CORZZ) have volatilities of 19.16% and 19.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBETCORZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.16%

19.89%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.16%

47.16%

+9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

143.55%

73.25%

+70.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

341.14%

97.32%

+243.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

341.14%

97.32%

+243.82%

Dividends

SBET vs. CORZZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither SBET nor CORZZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SBET vs. CORZZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SharpLink Gaming Ltd. and Core Scientific Inc. Tranche 2 Warrants. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
12.06M
115.24M
(SBET) Total Revenue
(CORZZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SBET and CORZZ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CORZZ has higher volatility (19.89%) compared to SBET (19.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBET dropped -93.01% vs CORZZ's -65.20%.

CORZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBET and CORZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer