SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE
SBEM.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and SYBK.DE (SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - SBEM.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while SYBK.DE is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg SASB US Corporate High Yield ESG Ex-Controversies Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBEM.L returned 3.80%/yr vs 5.05%/yr for SYBK.DE. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBEM.L charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SYBK.DE.
Performance
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SBEM.L is traded in GBp, while SYBK.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SYBK.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBEM.L achieves a 4.66% return, which is significantly higher than SYBK.DE's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, SBEM.L has underperformed SYBK.DE with an annualized return of 3.80%, while SYBK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.05% annualized return.
SBEM.L
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 16.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.54%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
SYBK.DE
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- 8.65%
- 3Y*
- 7.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 5.05%
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 4.66% | 7.42% | 9.45% | 5.95% | -10.24% | -1.29% | 1.29% | 10.91% | 1.42% | 0.47% |
SYBK.DE SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) | 3.60% | 0.79% | 10.80% | 6.51% | -0.14% | 5.82% | 0.92% | 6.70% | 5.82% | -3.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBEM.L and SYBK.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2016 | 0.68 |
The correlation between SBEM.L and SYBK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SBEM.L
SYBK.DE
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) (SYBK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBEM.L | SYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.24 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.55 | 2.09 | +2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.15 | 5.64 | +7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBEM.L drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, smaller than the maximum SYBK.DE drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBEM.L and SYBK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBEM.L | SYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -27.52% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.53% | -4.13% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.79% | -10.09% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | -10.09% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.61% | -14.34% | -7.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.50% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -7.77% | +0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.53% | -0.31% |
Volatility
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) (SYBK.DE) have volatilities of 1.79% and 1.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBEM.L | SYBK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 1.85% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.75% | 4.86% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.54% | 6.48% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.12% | 8.13% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 9.23% | +1.73% |
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBEM.L has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than SYBK.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBEM.L vs. SYBK.DE - Dividend Comparison
SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, less than SYBK.DE's 7.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.40% | 7.69% | 6.27% | 6.49% | 5.73% | 4.35% | 4.92% | 4.83% | 4.47% | 4.84% | 2.27% | 0.00% |
SYBK.DE SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Dist) | 7.02% | 7.68% | 6.90% | 6.70% | 5.79% | 5.11% | 6.01% | 5.54% | 5.04% | 6.51% | 5.30% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBEM.L and SYBK.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SYBK.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SYBK.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SBEM.L.
SBEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SYBK.DE is High Yield Bonds. SBEM.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while SYBK.DE tracks Bloomberg SASB US Corporate High Yield ESG Ex-Controversies Select. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for SBEM.L and 0.30% for SYBK.DE.
Find the right allocation for SBEM.L and SYBK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer