SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L
SBEM.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and SEMH.L (SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, from UBS and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SBEM.L returned 4.55%/yr vs 3.24%/yr for SEMH.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.42% expense ratio.
Performance
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SBEM.L is traded in GBp, while SEMH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEMH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBEM.L achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than SEMH.L's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SBEM.L has outperformed SEMH.L with an annualized return of 4.55%, while SEMH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.24% annualized return.
SBEM.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
SEMH.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.48% | 7.42% | 9.46% | 5.94% | -10.24% | -1.29% | 1.28% | 10.91% | 1.42% | 0.47% |
SEMH.L SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF | 1.29% | 0.53% | 6.47% | 0.40% | 4.24% | 0.98% | -1.05% | 2.26% | 5.87% | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBEM.L and SEMH.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SBEM.L and SEMH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBEM.L
SEMH.L
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBEM.L | SEMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.19 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 1.53 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 4.17 | +7.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBEM.L | SEMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.10 | +1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.44 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.36 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.43 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBEM.L drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than SEMH.L's maximum drawdown of -13.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBEM.L and SEMH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBEM.L | SEMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -13.63% | -7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.53% | -4.24% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.79% | -8.07% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | -13.61% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.61% | -13.63% | -7.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.48% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -5.56% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 1.56% | -0.33% |
Volatility
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEMH.L) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBEM.L | SEMH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 1.65% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 4.21% | +0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 5.89% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.85% | 7.64% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 8.93% | +1.95% |
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SBEM.L and SEMH.L have an expense ratio of 0.42%.
Dividends
SBEM.L vs. SEMH.L - Dividend Comparison
SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than SEMH.L's 4.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.53% | 7.69% | 6.28% | 6.49% | 5.72% | 4.35% | 4.92% | 4.83% | 4.47% | 4.84% | 2.27% | 0.00% |
SEMH.L SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF | 4.84% | 4.97% | 4.24% | 3.18% | 2.39% | 2.72% | 3.42% | 3.52% | 2.69% | 3.13% | 2.55% | 1.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBEM.L and SEMH.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.42% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SBEM.L and SEMH.L have the same expense ratio: 0.42% per year.
Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and State Street.
Find the right allocation for SBEM.L and SEMH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer