SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L
SBEM.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and PEMD.L (Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds tracking the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, from UBS and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SBEM.L returned 3.47%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for PEMD.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBEM.L charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PEMD.L.
Performance
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SBEM.L is traded in GBp, while PEMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PEMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBEM.L achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than PEMD.L's 2.00% return.
SBEM.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 14.55%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 4.55%
PEMD.L
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 11.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- —
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.48% | 7.42% | 9.46% | 5.94% | -10.24% | -1.29% | 1.28% | 10.91% | 1.42% | -0.89% |
PEMD.L Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 2.00% | 4.77% | 8.05% | 5.06% | -6.65% | -1.65% | 2.16% | 8.95% | 1.13% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBEM.L and PEMD.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SBEM.L and PEMD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBEM.L
PEMD.L
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBEM.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 2.45 | +1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.84 | 7.16 | +4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBEM.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.55 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.34 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.21 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBEM.L drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than PEMD.L's maximum drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBEM.L and PEMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBEM.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -18.93% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.53% | -4.54% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.79% | -9.01% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | -13.78% | -3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.18% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -7.55% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.23% | 1.56% | -0.33% |
Volatility
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) is 1.66%, while Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist (PEMD.L) has a volatility of 2.34%. This indicates that SBEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBEM.L | PEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.66% | 2.34% | -0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.58% | 5.60% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.47% | 7.22% | -0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.85% | 9.98% | -1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 12.31% | -1.43% |
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBEM.L has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than PEMD.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBEM.L vs. PEMD.L - Dividend Comparison
SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than PEMD.L's 5.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEMD.L Invesco Emerging Markets USD Bond UCITS ETF Dist | 5.45% | 5.49% | 5.83% | 5.54% | 4.94% | 3.93% | 3.60% | 4.99% | 5.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.53% | 7.69% | 6.28% | 6.49% | 5.72% | 4.35% | 4.92% | 4.83% | 4.47% | 4.84% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBEM.L and PEMD.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PEMD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PEMD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SBEM.L.
Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for SBEM.L and 0.25% for PEMD.L.
Find the right allocation for SBEM.L and PEMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer