PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SBEM.L is traded in GBp, while JPBM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JPBM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBEM.L achieves a 2.48% return, which is significantly higher than JPBM.L's 2.24% return.


SBEM.L

1D
0.23%
1M
2.35%
YTD
2.48%
6M
2.78%
1Y
14.55%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
4.55%

JPBM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.10%
YTD
2.24%
6M
1.87%
1Y
13.22%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SBEM.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.48%7.42%9.46%5.94%-10.24%-1.29%1.28%10.91%7.12%
JPBM.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
2.24%6.76%4.67%4.36%-5.01%0.35%3.05%16.46%7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between SBEM.L and JPBM.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018

0.94

The correlation between SBEM.L and JPBM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBEM.L
SBEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SBEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JPBM.L
JPBM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JPBM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPBM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBEM.LJPBM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.07

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

9.23

+2.62

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the JPBM.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBEM.L and JPBM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBEM.LJPBM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.14

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.43

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.46

+0.03

Drawdowns

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBEM.L drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, which is greater than JPBM.L's maximum drawdown of -19.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBEM.L and JPBM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBEM.LJPBM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-19.74%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.53%

-4.28%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.79%

-8.37%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.20%

-13.03%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-4.69%

-2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

1.43%

-0.20%

Volatility

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.L) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBEM.LJPBM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.62%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

4.50%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.47%

6.15%

+0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.85%

8.67%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.88%

10.21%

+0.67%

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBEM.L has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than JPBM.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBEM.L vs. JPBM.L - Dividend Comparison

SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, less than JPBM.L's 6.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JPBM.L
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
6.86%7.14%6.80%6.27%6.59%5.57%5.57%5.84%5.28%0.00%0.00%
SBEM.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
6.53%7.69%6.28%6.49%5.72%4.35%4.92%4.83%4.47%4.84%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBEM.L and JPBM.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPBM.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPBM.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SBEM.L.

Both ETFs track JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for SBEM.L and 0.39% for JPBM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBEM.L and JPBM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer