SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L
SBEM.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and HYGB.L (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - SBEM.L tracks the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD while HYGB.L tracks the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SBEM.L returned 2.81%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for HYGB.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SBEM.L charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for HYGB.L.
Performance
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SBEM.L is traded in GBp, while HYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYGB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBEM.L achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly lower than HYGB.L's 3.73% return.
SBEM.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 2.81%
- 10Y*
- 3.15%
HYGB.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.76%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- —
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 2.46% | 7.42% | 9.45% | 5.95% | -10.24% | -1.29% | 1.29% | 10.91% | 7.78% |
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.73% | 1.56% | 13.72% | 1.66% | -2.52% | 0.59% | 1.90% | 10.99% | -23.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBEM.L and HYGB.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SBEM.L and HYGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
SBEM.L
HYGB.L
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SBEM.L | HYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.21 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.33 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 5.93 | +2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBEM.L drawdown since its inception was -21.61%, smaller than the maximum HYGB.L drawdown of -26.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBEM.L and HYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBEM.L | HYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.61% | -26.72% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.53% | -3.31% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.79% | -8.96% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.20% | -23.02% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -1.93% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.17% | -14.28% | +7.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 1.30% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) have volatilities of 1.49% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBEM.L | HYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 1.48% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.54% | 4.96% | -0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.54% | 6.52% | +0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.11% | 18.18% | -9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.29% | 17.40% | -7.11% |
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SBEM.L has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SBEM.L vs. HYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
SBEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, while HYGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 6.53% | 7.69% | 6.27% | 6.49% | 5.73% | 4.35% | 4.92% | 4.83% | 4.47% | 4.84% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBEM.L and HYGB.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for SBEM.L.
SBEM.L tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while HYGB.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for SBEM.L and 0.40% for HYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for SBEM.L and HYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer