PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SBDAX vs. NJTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX) and T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SBDAX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than NJTFX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, SBDAX has underperformed NJTFX with an annualized return of 1.23%, while NJTFX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.49% annualized return.


SBDAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.46%
1Y
5.68%
3Y*
3.04%
5Y*
0.36%
10Y*
1.23%

NJTFX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.73%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.72%
1Y
9.51%
3Y*
4.92%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SBDAX
SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund
0.18%5.70%0.02%4.02%-7.30%-0.55%3.76%5.90%0.87%3.74%
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
1.94%5.00%4.01%7.17%-10.24%2.67%4.73%6.65%1.31%5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SBDAX and NJTFX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999

0.81

The correlation between SBDAX and NJTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SBDAX vs. NJTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SBDAX
SBDAX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SBDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SBDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NJTFX
NJTFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NJTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NJTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
NJTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NJTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NJTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX) and T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SBDAXNJTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.92

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

3.64

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.80

13.78

-8.99

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SBDAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the NJTFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SBDAX and NJTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SBDAXNJTFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

3.50

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.40

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.64

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

1.27

-0.29

Drawdowns

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SBDAX drawdown since its inception was -11.86%, smaller than the maximum NJTFX drawdown of -15.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBDAX and NJTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SBDAXNJTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-15.19%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.40%

-2.59%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

-5.69%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.86%

-15.19%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.86%

-15.19%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.01%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-1.81%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

0.68%

+0.51%

Volatility

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX) is 0.82%, while T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund (NJTFX) has a volatility of 1.06%. This indicates that SBDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NJTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SBDAXNJTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.06%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

1.98%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30%

2.72%

-0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.19%

3.99%

-0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.56%

3.87%

-0.31%

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SBDAX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than NJTFX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

SBDAX vs. NJTFX - Dividend Comparison

SBDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than NJTFX's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NJTFX
T. Rowe Price New Jersey Tax Free Bond Fund
4.45%4.44%4.27%3.27%2.03%2.56%2.79%2.84%3.13%3.13%3.26%3.36%
SBDAX
SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund
2.17%2.74%1.78%1.26%1.38%1.35%1.87%2.21%1.98%1.99%2.23%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


SBDAX and NJTFX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NJTFX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to SBDAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SBDAX dropped -11.86% vs NJTFX's -15.19%.

NJTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SBDAX and NJTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer