SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO
SBC.TO (Brompton Split Banc Corp.) is a stock, while ZEM.TO (BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. Over the past 10 years, SBC.TO returned 20.70%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for ZEM.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SBC.TO achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than ZEM.TO's 29.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SBC.TO has outperformed ZEM.TO with an annualized return of 20.70%, while ZEM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.
SBC.TO
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 32.35%
- 6M
- 42.96%
- 1Y
- 114.91%
- 3Y*
- 45.26%
- 5Y*
- 23.81%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
ZEM.TO
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 10.97%
- YTD
- 29.19%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- 58.51%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBC.TO Brompton Split Banc Corp. | 32.35% | 73.30% | 21.93% | -7.95% | -3.13% | 70.49% | -7.21% | 24.33% | -12.84% | 22.65% |
ZEM.TO BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 29.19% | 27.66% | 15.21% | 7.38% | -15.80% | -2.64% | 16.41% | 13.20% | -8.06% | 30.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between SBC.TO and ZEM.TO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2009 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SBC.TO
ZEM.TO
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Split Banc Corp. (SBC.TO) and BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SBC.TO | ZEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.82 | 1.54 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.86 | 5.05 | +1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.92 | 18.35 | +8.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SBC.TO | ZEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.24 | 2.79 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 0.59 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.60 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.42 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SBC.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.75%, which is greater than ZEM.TO's maximum drawdown of -34.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SBC.TO and ZEM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SBC.TO | ZEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.75% | -34.79% | -43.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.84% | -11.64% | -5.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.85% | -13.59% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.43% | -30.69% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.79% | -34.79% | -32.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.34% | -0.57% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -10.00% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 3.20% | +1.08% |
Volatility
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brompton Split Banc Corp. (SBC.TO) is 7.44%, while BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF (ZEM.TO) has a volatility of 8.78%. This indicates that SBC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SBC.TO | ZEM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 8.78% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.20% | 18.99% | -1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.07% | 21.06% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.60% | 17.21% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.15% | 18.56% | +9.59% |
Dividends
SBC.TO vs. ZEM.TO - Dividend Comparison
SBC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than ZEM.TO's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBC.TO Brompton Split Banc Corp. | 7.25% | 8.08% | 12.03% | 12.89% | 10.45% | 8.97% | 11.32% | 9.20% | 10.43% | 8.11% | 7.74% | 10.48% |
ZEM.TO BMO MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF | 1.73% | 2.23% | 2.56% | 2.87% | 2.89% | 2.50% | 1.69% | 2.42% | 2.20% | 1.76% | 4.19% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SBC.TO and ZEM.TO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SBC.TO and ZEM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer