PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAXPY vs. SZLMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sampo OYJ (SAXPY) and Swiss Life Holding AG ADR (SZLMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAXPY achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than SZLMY's -5.68% return.


SAXPY

1D
-1.10%
1M
1.78%
YTD
-11.38%
6M
-7.76%
1Y
0.91%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
9.17%

SZLMY

1D
-1.32%
1M
-6.52%
YTD
-5.68%
6M
0.74%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
21.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAXPY
Sampo OYJ
-11.38%55.00%-2.90%-2.91%14.62%21.41%7.48%7.21%-14.71%3.42%
SZLMY
Swiss Life Holding AG ADR
-5.68%54.33%17.54%44.47%-12.51%37.89%-7.06%35.51%14.50%-6.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SAXPY and SZLMY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017

0.28

The correlation between SAXPY and SZLMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAXPY:

$54.71B

SZLMY:

$29.25B

EPS

SAXPY:

$0.72

SZLMY:

$4.34

PE Ratio

SAXPY:

28.76

SZLMY:

12.08

PEG Ratio

SAXPY:

0.69

SZLMY:

8.17

PS Ratio

SAXPY:

4.19

SZLMY:

0.72

PB Ratio

SAXPY:

7.04

SZLMY:

4.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAXPY:

$11.42B

SZLMY:

$40.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAXPY:

$8.19B

SZLMY:

$42.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

SAXPY:

$2.30B

SZLMY:

$2.13B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAXPY vs. SZLMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAXPY
SAXPY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SAXPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAXPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAXPY Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SAXPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAXPY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SZLMY
SZLMY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SZLMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SZLMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SZLMY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SZLMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SZLMY Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sampo OYJ (SAXPY) and Swiss Life Holding AG ADR (SZLMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAXPYSZLMYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.05

0.35

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.19

0.65

-0.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.08

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

0.63

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.14

1.57

-1.43

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAXPY Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the SZLMY Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAXPY and SZLMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAXPYSZLMYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

0.35

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.65

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.61

-0.11

Drawdowns

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAXPY drawdown since its inception was -52.24%, roughly equal to the maximum SZLMY drawdown of -50.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAXPY and SZLMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAXPYSZLMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.24%

-50.48%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-13.36%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-13.36%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.90%

-35.97%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.55%

-10.01%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-8.37%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.65%

5.37%

+1.28%

Volatility

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sampo OYJ (SAXPY) is 5.28%, while Swiss Life Holding AG ADR (SZLMY) has a volatility of 5.99%. This indicates that SAXPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SZLMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAXPYSZLMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

5.99%

-0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.71%

17.95%

-4.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.52%

24.07%

-6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

32.66%

-12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.47%

36.95%

-12.48%

Dividends

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Dividend Comparison

SAXPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, less than SZLMY's 4.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAXPY
Sampo OYJ
4.05%3.10%4.77%14.96%8.53%4.07%6.34%8.80%7.18%9.25%10.54%4.27%
SZLMY
Swiss Life Holding AG ADR
4.41%3.54%4.63%4.56%5.29%2.22%3.04%0.00%3.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sampo OYJ and Swiss Life Holding AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
2.50B
22.53B
(SAXPY) Total Revenue
(SZLMY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SAXPY vs. SZLMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sampo OYJ and Swiss Life Holding AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
100.0%
Portfolio components
SAXPY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sampo OYJ reported a gross profit of 2.50B and revenue of 2.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

SZLMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Swiss Life Holding AG ADR reported a gross profit of 22.53B and revenue of 22.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

SAXPY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sampo OYJ reported an operating income of 28.46M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

SZLMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Swiss Life Holding AG ADR reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 22.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SAXPY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sampo OYJ reported a net income of -46.76M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.

SZLMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Swiss Life Holding AG ADR reported a net income of 648.60M and revenue of 22.53B, resulting in a net margin of 2.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAXPY and SZLMY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SZLMY has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to SAXPY (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAXPY dropped -52.24% vs SZLMY's -50.48%.

SZLMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.35 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAXPY and SZLMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer