SATS vs. SNOW
SATS (EchoStar Corporation) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SATS in Communication Equipment, SNOW in Software - Application. Over the past 5 years, SATS returned 34.46%/yr vs -0.11%/yr for SNOW. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SATS vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SATS achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's 9.99% return.
SATS
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 63.34%
- 1Y
- 648.73%
- 3Y*
- 94.24%
- 5Y*
- 34.46%
- 10Y*
- 82.83%
SNOW
- 1D
- -7.61%
- 1M
- 67.31%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- -8.95%
- 1Y
- 15.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
SATS vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATS EchoStar Corporation | 11.24% | 374.67% | 38.20% | -0.66% | -36.70% | 24.35% | -25.15% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 9.99% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 10.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between SATS and SNOW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between SATS and SNOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SATS:
$34.95B
SNOW:
$83.34B
SATS:
-$80.77
SNOW:
-$3.53
SATS:
2.35
SNOW:
16.27
SATS:
6.21
SNOW:
40.44
SATS:
$14.80B
SNOW:
$5.03B
SATS:
$5.79B
SNOW:
$3.38B
SATS:
-$16.89B
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SATS vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
SATS
SNOW
SATS vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EchoStar Corporation (SATS) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SATS | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.12 | +0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 32.88 | 0.27 | +32.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 60.87 | 0.60 | +60.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SATS | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.13 | 0.24 | +5.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.00 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | -0.01 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SATS vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SATS drawdown since its inception was -78.33%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATS and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SATS | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.33% | -72.99% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.91% | -56.30% | +36.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.22% | -56.30% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.02% | -72.99% | +4.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.72% | -39.96% | +25.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.24% | -49.10% | +17.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.74% | 25.82% | -15.08% |
Volatility
SATS vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for EchoStar Corporation (SATS) is 17.10%, while Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) has a volatility of 36.32%. This indicates that SATS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SATS | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.10% | 36.32% | -19.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.55% | 54.14% | -12.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 107.44% | 65.21% | +42.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.08% | 61.92% | +7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4,551.36% | 62.81% | +4,488.55% |
Dividends
SATS vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither SATS nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SATS EchoStar Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 85.50% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SATS vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EchoStar Corporation and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SATS vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
SATS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
SATS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported an operating income of 392.85M and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
SATS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported a net income of -189.14M and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SATS and SNOW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SNOW has higher volatility (36.32%) compared to SATS (17.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATS dropped -78.33% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
SATS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.13 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SATS and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer