PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SATS vs. LITE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SATS vs. LITE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EchoStar Corporation (SATS) and Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SATS achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than LITE's 150.02% return. Over the past 10 years, SATS has outperformed LITE with an annualized return of 82.88%, while LITE has yielded a comparatively lower 43.74% annualized return.


SATS

1D
-10.97%
1M
-16.87%
YTD
4.95%
6M
6.25%
1Y
577.43%
3Y*
87.23%
5Y*
33.39%
10Y*
82.88%

LITE

1D
3.59%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
150.02%
6M
184.13%
1Y
1,017.52%
3Y*
158.28%
5Y*
62.72%
10Y*
43.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SATS vs. LITE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SATS
EchoStar Corporation
4.95%374.67%38.20%-0.66%-36.70%24.35%-51.07%16,499.32%-38.70%16.56%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
150.02%339.06%60.15%0.48%-50.68%11.57%19.55%88.76%-14.09%26.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SATS and LITE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2015

0.26

The correlation between SATS and LITE shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SATS:

$32.97B

LITE:

$88.65B

EPS

SATS:

-$80.77

LITE:

$5.26

PS Ratio

SATS:

2.22

LITE:

30.95

PB Ratio

SATS:

5.85

LITE:

29.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

SATS:

$14.80B

LITE:

$2.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SATS:

$5.79B

LITE:

$938.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

SATS:

-$16.89B

LITE:

$470.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SATS vs. LITE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SATS
SATS Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
SATS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SATS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SATS Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SATS Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SATS Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LITE
LITE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LITE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
LITE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SATS vs. LITE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EchoStar Corporation (SATS) and Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SATSLITEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-6.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.71

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

26.91

34.43

-7.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

48.80

126.26

-77.47

SATS vs. LITE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SATS Sharpe Ratio is 5.06, which is lower than the LITE Sharpe Ratio of 11.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SATS and LITE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SATS vs. LITE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SATS drawdown since its inception was -78.33%, which is greater than LITE's maximum drawdown of -66.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SATS and LITE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SATSLITEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.33%

-66.89%

-11.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.91%

-28.70%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.22%

-50.63%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.02%

-66.48%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.33%

-66.89%

-11.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.55%

-12.49%

-7.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.21%

-23.57%

-7.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.97%

7.81%

+3.16%

Volatility

SATS vs. LITE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EchoStar Corporation (SATS) is 22.65%, while Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) has a volatility of 28.12%. This indicates that SATS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SATSLITEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.65%

28.12%

-5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.93%

69.73%

-27.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.03%

86.47%

+19.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.48%

59.94%

+9.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4,550.46%

56.62%

+4,493.84%

Dividends

SATS vs. LITE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SATS nor LITE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SATS
EchoStar Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%85.50%

Financials

SATS vs. LITE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EchoStar Corporation and Lumentum Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
3.67B
808.40M
(SATS) Total Revenue
(LITE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SATS vs. LITE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EchoStar Corporation and Lumentum Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
45.5%
44.2%
Portfolio components
SATS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.67B and revenue of 3.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

LITE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 357.00M and revenue of 808.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.

SATS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported an operating income of 392.85M and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

LITE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 174.50M and revenue of 808.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

SATS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EchoStar Corporation reported a net income of -189.14M and revenue of 3.67B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.

LITE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lumentum Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 144.20M and revenue of 808.40M, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SATS and LITE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITE has higher volatility (28.12%) compared to SATS (22.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SATS dropped -78.33% vs LITE's -66.89%.

LITE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.43 vs 5.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SATS and LITE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer