SASU.L vs. ESES.L
SASU.L (iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ESES.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - SASU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Screened Index, while ESES.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Universal Select Business Screens Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SASU.L returned 12.84%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for ESES.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SASU.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESES.L.
Performance
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SASU.L is traded in USD, while ESES.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ESES.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SASU.L achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than ESES.L's 20.00% return.
SASU.L
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- —
ESES.L
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 20.00%
- 1Y
- 35.44%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.51%
- 10Y*
- —
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SASU.L iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.44% | 17.83% | 26.90% | 30.69% | -21.34% | 10.04% |
ESES.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 20.00% | 33.41% | 5.75% | 8.37% | -20.64% | 6,714.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SASU.L and ESES.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SASU.L and ESES.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SASU.L vs. ESES.L — Risk / Return Rank
SASU.L
ESES.L
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) and Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SASU.L | ESES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.69 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.30 | 9.13 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SASU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, roughly equal to the maximum ESES.L drawdown of -35.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASU.L and ESES.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SASU.L | ESES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.07% | -35.50% | +1.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.53% | -13.13% | +3.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.83% | -21.98% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -35.02% | +8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.08% | -8.69% | +6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -13.86% | +8.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 3.87% | -1.47% |
Volatility
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) is 3.34%, while Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ESES.L) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that SASU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESES.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SASU.L | ESES.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.34% | 7.68% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.18% | 18.81% | -8.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.13% | 20.87% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 23.55% | -6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 3,189.82% | -3,171.43% |
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SASU.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ESES.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SASU.L vs. ESES.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SASU.L nor ESES.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SASU.L and ESES.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SASU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SASU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESES.L.
SASU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ESES.L is Emerging Markets Equities. SASU.L tracks MSCI USA Screened Index, while ESES.L tracks MSCI EM Universal Select Business Screens Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SASU.L and 0.19% for ESES.L.
Find the right allocation for SASU.L and ESES.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer