PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SASU.L vs. BBUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SASU.L having a 8.44% return and BBUS.L slightly higher at 8.71%.


SASU.L

1D
-1.40%
1M
-0.64%
6M
7.91%
YTD
8.44%
1Y
19.98%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*

BBUS.L

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.42%
6M
7.80%
YTD
8.71%
1Y
19.34%
3Y*
19.36%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SASU.L
iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.44%17.83%26.90%30.69%-21.34%28.26%22.00%14.38%
BBUS.L
BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc
8.71%17.54%24.98%27.64%-19.96%27.64%20.13%13.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SASU.L and BBUS.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019

0.98

The correlation between SASU.L and BBUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SASU.L
SASU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SASU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SASU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SASU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SASU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SASU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS.L
BBUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) and BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SASU.LBBUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.23

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

9.06

-0.76

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SASU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the BBUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SASU.L and BBUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SASU.L drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS.L drawdown of -34.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASU.L and BBUS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SASU.LBBUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.07%

-34.26%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-8.62%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.83%

-19.36%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.24%

-25.33%

-0.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-1.74%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-5.29%

-0.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

2.13%

+0.27%

Volatility

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SASU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.34% compared to BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS USD Acc (BBUS.L) at 3.17%. This indicates that SASU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SASU.LBBUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.34%

3.17%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.18%

9.46%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.13%

12.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.20%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.39%

17.72%

+0.67%

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SASU.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SASU.L vs. BBUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SASU.L nor BBUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SASU.L and BBUS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBUS.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBUS.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SASU.L.

SASU.L tracks MSCI USA Screened Index, while BBUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SASU.L and 0.04% for BBUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SASU.L and BBUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer