SASMX vs. UMBHX
SASMX (ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund) and UMBHX (Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SASMX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for UMBHX.
Performance
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SASMX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
UMBHX
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.46% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SASMX and UMBHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SASMX vs. UMBHX — Risk / Return Rank
SASMX
UMBHX
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund (SASMX) and Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund (UMBHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SASMX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SASMX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -20.59 | +21.01 |
Drawdowns
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SASMX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than UMBHX's maximum drawdown of -1.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SASMX and UMBHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SASMX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.81% | -1.86% | -52.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.86% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.09% | -1.26% | -12.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | — | — |
Volatility
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SASMX | UMBHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.40% | 6.22% | +14.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 6.22% | +18.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 6.22% | +17.62% |
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SASMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than UMBHX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
SASMX vs. UMBHX - Dividend Comparison
SASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.14%, while UMBHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SASMX ClearBridge Small Cap Growth Fund | 18.14% | 20.31% | 17.01% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 11.84% | 7.04% | 7.62% | 15.70% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 1.26% |
UMBHX Carillon Scout Small Cap Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SASMX and UMBHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for SASMX and UMBHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer