PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Sanofi (SAN.PA) and Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAN.PA is traded in EUR, while 0700.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 0700.HK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAN.PA achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly higher than 0700.HK's -21.04% return. Over the past 10 years, SAN.PA has underperformed 0700.HK with an annualized return of 5.46%, while 0700.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.72% annualized return.


SAN.PA

1D
0.38%
1M
4.57%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
-2.17%
5Y*
1.20%
10Y*
5.46%

0700.HK

1D
1.50%
1M
2.78%
YTD
-21.04%
6M
-23.24%
1Y
-8.00%
3Y*
8.87%
5Y*
-1.84%
10Y*
11.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAN.PA
Sanofi
-2.23%-7.87%8.77%3.64%4.92%16.86%-8.97%23.41%10.36%-3.49%
0700.HK
Tencent Holdings Ltd
-21.04%27.49%53.49%-9.57%-19.74%-13.18%38.88%23.33%-19.03%86.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SAN.PA and 0700.HK is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.09

The correlation between SAN.PA and 0700.HK shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAN.PA
SAN.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SAN.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAN.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAN.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
SAN.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAN.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

0700.HK
0700.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
0700.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0700.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
0700.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
0700.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
0700.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sanofi (SAN.PA) and Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAN.PA0700.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

0.98

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.21

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

-0.46

-0.40

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAN.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is comparable to the 0700.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAN.PA and 0700.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAN.PA drawdown since its inception was -43.30%, smaller than the maximum 0700.HK drawdown of -67.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAN.PA and 0700.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAN.PA0700.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.30%

-67.26%

+23.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-37.23%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.80%

-37.23%

+9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.80%

-59.38%

+31.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

-67.26%

+36.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.98%

-31.05%

+8.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.52%

-17.53%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

17.18%

-8.26%

Volatility

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sanofi (SAN.PA) is 6.61%, while Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that SAN.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0700.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAN.PA0700.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

13.35%

-6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.36%

24.10%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.04%

30.54%

-6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

39.22%

-16.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.35%

35.60%

-14.25%

Dividends

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Dividend Comparison

SAN.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, more than 0700.HK's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0700.HK
Tencent Holdings Ltd
1.14%0.75%0.82%0.82%0.50%0.38%0.23%0.29%0.31%0.16%0.27%0.26%
SAN.PA
Sanofi
5.38%4.74%4.01%3.97%3.71%3.61%4.00%3.43%4.00%4.12%3.81%3.63%

Financials

SAN.PA vs. 0700.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sanofi and Tencent Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SAN.PA values in EUR, 0700.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


SAN.PA and 0700.HK have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAN.PA and 0700.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer