PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAMKX vs. SAEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SA U.S. Core Market Fund (SAMKX) and SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAMKX achieves a 9.47% return, which is significantly lower than SAEMX's 27.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SAMKX has outperformed SAEMX with an annualized return of 14.63%, while SAEMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.43% annualized return.


SAMKX

1D
1.02%
1M
0.49%
YTD
9.47%
6M
8.92%
1Y
24.94%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
12.63%
10Y*
14.63%

SAEMX

1D
0.38%
1M
5.47%
YTD
27.19%
6M
28.85%
1Y
47.33%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
10.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAMKX
SA U.S. Core Market Fund
9.47%15.80%22.80%25.81%-18.91%25.66%18.88%30.56%-4.69%22.20%
SAEMX
SA Emerging Markets Value Fund
27.19%29.21%5.47%15.72%-11.61%10.51%0.88%8.05%-12.11%31.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SAMKX and SAEMX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.38

The correlation between SAMKX and SAEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAMKX vs. SAEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMKX
SAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SAEMX
SAEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
SAEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA U.S. Core Market Fund (SAMKX) and SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAMKXSAEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.56

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.33

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.98

15.61

-1.63

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAMKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the SAEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAMKX and SAEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAMKX drawdown since its inception was -33.77%, smaller than the maximum SAEMX drawdown of -63.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAMKX and SAEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAMKXSAEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.77%

-63.08%

+29.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-12.22%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-17.80%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.88%

-25.12%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-49.23%

+15.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-0.69%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-17.18%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.24%

-1.33%

Volatility

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SA U.S. Core Market Fund (SAMKX) is 4.44%, while SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that SAMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAMKXSAEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

7.34%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

14.51%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

17.09%

-5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

15.17%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

15.61%

+1.96%

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAMKX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than SAEMX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

SAMKX vs. SAEMX - Dividend Comparison

SAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than SAEMX's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAEMX
SA Emerging Markets Value Fund
2.70%3.43%4.37%4.07%3.54%2.86%1.76%2.18%1.78%1.28%1.23%1.25%
SAMKX
SA U.S. Core Market Fund
0.60%0.66%0.69%0.86%5.83%7.72%8.08%12.72%6.46%4.09%6.20%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAMKX and SAEMX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAEMX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to SAMKX (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAMKX dropped -33.77% vs SAEMX's -63.08%.

SAEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAMKX and SAEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer