PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAJP.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAJP.L is traded in USD, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAJP.L achieves a 16.26% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.64% return.


SAJP.L

1D
-1.17%
1M
-1.57%
6M
10.14%
YTD
16.26%
1Y
35.58%
3Y*
17.39%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*

CSP1.L

1D
0.64%
1M
0.52%
6M
10.36%
YTD
10.64%
1Y
22.24%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.26%25.26%6.44%20.16%-17.41%0.61%17.09%19.24%-9.46%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.64%17.63%25.22%26.11%-18.77%29.88%17.14%31.49%-9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SAJP.L and CSP1.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.60

The correlation between SAJP.L and CSP1.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAJP.L
SAJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SAJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SAJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAJP.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAJP.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.55

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.96

10.42

-1.46

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAJP.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAJP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.71%, roughly equal to the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAJP.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAJP.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-33.51%

+0.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.88%

-8.68%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.47%

-19.33%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.71%

-25.16%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

-0.22%

-4.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-4.07%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

2.13%

+1.83%

Volatility

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAJP.L) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 3.12%. This indicates that SAJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAJP.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.13%

3.12%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.12%

8.66%

+9.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

11.64%

+10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

20.99%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.92%

18.84%

+0.08%

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAJP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SAJP.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SAJP.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SAJP.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SAJP.L.

SAJP.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. SAJP.L tracks iShares MSCI Japan Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SAJP.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAJP.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer