SAGWX vs. DSMLX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SAGWX (Touchstone Small Company Fund) and DSMLX (Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SAGWX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Touchstone, while DSMLX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Touchstone. Over the past 10 years, SAGWX returned 12.18%/yr vs 5.36%/yr for DSMLX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAGWX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for DSMLX.

Performance

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX) and Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund (DSMLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAGWX achieves a 15.97% return, which is significantly higher than DSMLX's -62.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SAGWX has outperformed DSMLX with an annualized return of 12.18%, while DSMLX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.36% annualized return.

SAGWX

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: 8.45%
• 6M: 10.62%
• YTD: 15.97%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 15.01%
• 5Y*: 8.92%
• 10Y*: 12.18%

DSMLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: -62.13%
• YTD: -62.38%
• 1Y: -61.99%
• 3Y*: -14.78%
• 5Y*: -10.91%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAGWX Touchstone Small Company Fund	15.97%	9.58%	13.32%	15.71%	-14.64%	22.83%	17.58%	29.44%	-8.42%	17.32%
DSMLX Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund	-62.38%	15.30%	29.59%	33.52%	-26.41%	21.16%	29.19%	47.62%	-5.04%	38.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SAGWX and DSMLX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2009	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SAGWX and DSMLX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

SAGWX vs. DSMLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAGWX

SAGWX Risk / Return Rank: 59
SAGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SAGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SAGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SAGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SAGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

DSMLX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX) and Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund (DSMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SAGWX	DSMLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	-1.02	+2.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	-1.11	+3.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	0.52	+0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	-0.99	+3.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.25	-1.82	+11.07

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAGWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the DSMLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAGWX and DSMLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAGWX drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, smaller than the maximum DSMLX drawdown of -64.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAGWX and DSMLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAGWX	DSMLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.87%	-64.61%	+12.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.60%	-64.61%	+55.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.69%	-64.61%	+41.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.07%	-64.61%	+27.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.75%	-64.61%	+22.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-64.61%	+64.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-8.99%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	33.91%	-31.04%

Volatility

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone Small Company Fund (SAGWX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund (DSMLX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SAGWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DSMLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAGWX	DSMLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.03%	0.00%	+4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.78%	89.37%	-78.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.40%	62.88%	-47.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.86%	36.50%	-13.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.57%	30.08%	-7.51%

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAGWX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DSMLX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

SAGWX vs. DSMLX - Dividend Comparison

SAGWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, while DSMLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DSMLX Touchstone Large Company Growth Fund	11.74%	4.42%	2.77%	4.18%	3.43%	20.86%	13.17%	14.28%	7.73%	2.90%	3.70%	1.68%
SAGWX Touchstone Small Company Fund	5.02%	5.82%	6.03%	0.15%	2.57%	19.71%	0.10%	11.83%	14.83%	9.03%	8.71%	21.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAGWX and DSMLX in my portfolio?

SAGWX and DSMLX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SAGWX or DSMLX?

SAGWX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to DSMLX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SAGWX dropped -51.87% vs DSMLX's -64.61%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SAGWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.