SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L
SAGG.L (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and CMOP.L (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SAGG.L is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while CMOP.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAGG.L returned 215.72%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for CMOP.L. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SAGG.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for CMOP.L.
Performance
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SAGG.L is traded in GBP, while CMOP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMOP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAGG.L achieves a -1.45% return, which is significantly lower than CMOP.L's 24.84% return.
SAGG.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -1.45%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- 0.18%
- 5Y*
- 215.72%
- 10Y*
- —
CMOP.L
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 24.84%
- 6M
- 23.47%
- 1Y
- 38.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.08%
- 10Y*
- —
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAGG.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.45% | 0.53% | 0.03% | 975.51% | 1,013.35% | 616.49% | 2,058.65% | 3,293.93% | 383.58% | -1.30% |
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc | 24.84% | 8.23% | 6.01% | -12.72% | 28.44% | 28.71% | -7.11% | 3.31% | -5.01% | -0.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAGG.L and CMOP.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between SAGG.L and CMOP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAGG.L
CMOP.L
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SAGG.L) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAGG.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.39 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 5.07 | -4.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 11.63 | -11.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAGG.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 2.10 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.73 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.43 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAGG.L drawdown since its inception was -10.22%, smaller than the maximum CMOP.L drawdown of -28.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAGG.L and CMOP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAGG.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -28.78% | +18.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -7.63% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.18% | -14.89% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.71% | -28.78% | +20.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -4.98% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -12.18% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.34% | -0.73% |
Volatility
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SAGG.L) is 1.17%, while Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc (CMOP.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that SAGG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMOP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAGG.L | CMOP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 6.19% | -5.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.64% | 16.17% | -12.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.81% | 18.42% | -13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 475.05% | 16.59% | +458.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 485.36% | 15.15% | +470.21% |
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAGG.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CMOP.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SAGG.L vs. CMOP.L - Dividend Comparison
SAGG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while CMOP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMOP.L Invesco Bloomberg Commodity UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SAGG.L iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.52% | 3.13% | 2.68% | 95.35% | 147.52% | 130.26% | 156.35% | 167.63% | 76.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAGG.L and CMOP.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for CMOP.L.
SAGG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while CMOP.L is Commodities. SAGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while CMOP.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SAGG.L and 0.19% for CMOP.L.
Find the right allocation for SAGG.L and CMOP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer