PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAF.PA vs. TMUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Safran SA (SAF.PA) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAF.PA is traded in EUR, while TMUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMUS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAF.PA achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than TMUS's -4.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SAF.PA has outperformed TMUS with an annualized return of 19.93%, while TMUS has yielded a comparatively lower 16.48% annualized return.


SAF.PA

1D
3.36%
1M
17.89%
YTD
7.58%
6M
9.20%
1Y
26.36%
3Y*
32.52%
5Y*
21.49%
10Y*
19.93%

TMUS

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.82%
YTD
-4.79%
6M
-1.40%
1Y
-15.92%
3Y*
12.48%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
16.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAF.PA
Safran SA
7.58%41.80%34.36%37.72%9.15%-6.83%-15.76%32.58%24.66%26.88%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-4.79%-17.67%48.93%11.57%28.19%-7.56%57.78%26.07%4.86%-3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SAF.PA and TMUS is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2007

0.16

The correlation between SAF.PA and TMUS shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAF.PA vs. TMUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAF.PA
SAF.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safran SA (SAF.PA) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SAF.PATMUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.91

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

-0.52

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

-0.88

+3.82

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the TMUS Sharpe Ratio of -0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAF.PA and TMUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAF.PA drawdown since its inception was -64.89%, smaller than the maximum TMUS drawdown of -80.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAF.PA and TMUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAF.PATMUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-80.87%

+15.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.62%

-30.52%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.62%

-40.39%

+16.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.84%

-40.39%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.63%

-40.39%

-24.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

-35.97%

+28.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-23.33%

+9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.92%

18.10%

-9.18%

Volatility

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Volatility Comparison

Safran SA (SAF.PA) has a higher volatility of 9.36% compared to T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) at 7.69%. This indicates that SAF.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAF.PATMUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.36%

7.69%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.98%

20.18%

+7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.67%

25.97%

+5.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.41%

24.29%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.15%

26.83%

+6.32%

Dividends

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Dividend Comparison

SAF.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than TMUS's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAF.PA
Safran SA
1.06%0.98%1.04%0.85%0.43%0.40%0.00%1.32%1.52%0.97%2.15%1.96%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.09%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAF.PA vs. TMUS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safran SA and T-Mobile US, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SAF.PA values in EUR, TMUS values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SAF.PA and TMUS have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAF.PA and TMUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer