SAEMX vs. LCSMX
Compare and contrast key facts about SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX).
SAEMX is managed by SA Funds. It was launched on Apr 1, 2007. LCSMX is managed by Legg Mason. It was launched on Jan 9, 2018.
Performance
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEMX SA Emerging Markets Value Fund | 1.69% | 29.21% | 5.47% | 15.72% | -11.61% | 10.51% | 0.88% | 8.05% | -15.88% |
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 11.23% | 51.52% | -13.60% | 16.26% | -27.25% | 4.73% | 35.72% | 6.81% | 1.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEMX achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than LCSMX's 11.23% return.
SAEMX
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- -10.73%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 27.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.69%
- 10Y*
- 7.94%
LCSMX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -12.34%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 26.19%
- 1Y
- 63.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.71%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEMX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than LCSMX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SAEMX vs. LCSMX — Risk / Return Rank
SAEMX
LCSMX
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) and Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SAEMX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 2.92 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.33 | 3.47 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.54 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.11 | -2.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 16.92 | -9.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SAEMX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 2.92 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.26 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEMX and LCSMX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Dividend Comparison
SAEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than LCSMX's 0.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEMX SA Emerging Markets Value Fund | 3.38% | 3.43% | 4.37% | 4.07% | 3.54% | 2.86% | 1.76% | 2.18% | 1.78% | 1.28% | 1.23% | 1.25% |
LCSMX Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.29% | 1.22% | 1.11% | 3.03% | 0.48% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEMX drawdown since its inception was -63.08%, which is greater than LCSMX's maximum drawdown of -39.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEMX and LCSMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEMX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.08% | -39.72% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -15.39% | +3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.98% | -39.72% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.22% | -13.80% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -13.97% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.74% | -0.23% |
Volatility
SAEMX vs. LCSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SA Emerging Markets Value Fund (SAEMX) is 7.86%, while Martin Currie SMA-Shares Series EM Fund (LCSMX) has a volatility of 12.00%. This indicates that SAEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SAEMX | LCSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 12.00% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 17.91% | -6.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 22.02% | -4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.60% | 17.90% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.41% | 19.35% | -3.94% |