PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SAEM.L vs. MINT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

SAEM.L (iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SAEM.L tracks the iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while MINT.L tracks the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAEM.L returned 6.59%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for MINT.L. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAEM.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAEM.L achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly higher than MINT.L's 2.39% return.

SAEM.L

1D
-1.24%
1M
-7.79%
6M
11.92%
YTD
17.34%
1Y
33.01%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
—

MINT.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.39%
6M
2.17%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*
2.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAEM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		17.34%33.03%7.25%10.56%-20.46%-1.52%19.84%16.95%1.22%
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		2.39%4.66%5.75%5.72%-0.67%-0.09%1.30%3.28%0.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SAEM.L and MINT.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018

0.04

The correlation between SAEM.L and MINT.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SAEM.L
SAEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SAEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
MINT.L
MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAEM.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SAEM.LMINT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
7.86

-6.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.07
16.90

-14.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

3.57

-2.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

45.35

-42.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

232.26

-224.45

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAEM.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAEM.L drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEM.L and MINT.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SAEM.LMINT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.77%

-3.89%

-34.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

-0.10%

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.36%

-0.62%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.85%

-2.47%

-32.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-3.89%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.43%

0.00%

-9.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.86%

-0.23%

-12.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

0.02%

+4.17%

Volatility

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAEM.L) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) at 0.14%. This indicates that SAEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SAEM.LMINT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

0.14%

+9.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.67%

0.35%

+19.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.74%

0.58%

+21.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.31%

0.76%

+18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

0.95%

+19.57%

Dividends

SAEM.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

SAEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MINT.L
PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF		4.36%4.43%5.18%4.81%1.51%0.34%1.17%2.63%2.33%1.56%1.31%0.79%
SAEM.L
iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SAEM.L and MINT.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAEM.L tracks iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAEM.L and MINT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer