SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L
SAEM.L (iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HKOD.L (HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - SAEM.L tracks the iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while HKOD.L tracks the HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SAEM.L returned 6.59%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for HKOD.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SAEM.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HKOD.L.
Performance
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SAEM.L achieves a 17.34% return, which is significantly lower than HKOD.L's 70.37% return.
SAEM.L
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- 6M
- 11.92%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 33.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.20%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- —
HKOD.L
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- -20.60%
- 6M
- 52.67%
- YTD
- 70.37%
- 1Y
- 138.83%
- 3Y*
- 37.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.34%
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAEM.L iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 17.34% | 33.03% | 7.25% | 10.56% | -20.46% | -1.52% | 19.84% | 16.95% | 1.22% |
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF | 70.37% | 99.54% | -22.90% | 19.95% | -28.44% | -8.49% | 45.08% | 10.64% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SAEM.L and HKOD.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SAEM.L and HKOD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SAEM.L
HKOD.L
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAEM.L) and HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SAEM.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.45 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 5.77 | -3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 17.93 | -10.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SAEM.L drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum HKOD.L drawdown of -50.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAEM.L and HKOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SAEM.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -50.54% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.41% | -24.00% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.36% | -29.48% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.85% | -47.65% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.43% | -24.00% | +14.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.86% | -18.79% | +5.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 7.75% | -3.56% |
Volatility
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SAEM.L) is 9.20%, while HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF (HKOD.L) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that SAEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HKOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SAEM.L | HKOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.20% | 20.20% | -11.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.67% | 41.23% | -21.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 45.10% | -23.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 29.74% | -10.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 26.96% | -6.44% |
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SAEM.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HKOD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SAEM.L vs. HKOD.L - Dividend Comparison
SAEM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HKOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HKOD.L HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF | 0.43% | 0.68% | 1.54% | 1.08% | 0.72% | 0.61% | 0.02% | 0.29% | 0.56% | 0.10% |
SAEM.L iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SAEM.L and HKOD.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAEM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAEM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HKOD.L.
SAEM.L tracks iShares MSCI EM IMI Screened UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while HKOD.L tracks HSBC MSCI KOREA CAPPED UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SAEM.L and 0.50% for HKOD.L.
Find the right allocation for SAEM.L and HKOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer