SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE
SADU.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc) and XZEW.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SADU.DE is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Selection P-Series 5% Issuer Capped Index, while XZEW.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SADU.DE returned 29.06% vs 26.03% for XZEW.DE. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SADU.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for XZEW.DE.
Performance
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SADU.DE having a 14.70% return and XZEW.DE slightly lower at 14.02%.
SADU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 14.70%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XZEW.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SADU.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc | 14.70% | 2.73% | 27.24% | 3.86% |
XZEW.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C | 14.02% | 1.09% | 18.02% | 3.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADU.DE and XZEW.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.81 |
The correlation between SADU.DE and XZEW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SADU.DE
XZEW.DE
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SADU.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 1.66 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 3.19 | -0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADU.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, roughly equal to the maximum XZEW.DE drawdown of -23.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADU.DE and XZEW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADU.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -23.98% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.24% | -15.71% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -6.28% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.02% | 8.16% | +1.86% |
Volatility
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG UCITS ETF 1C (XZEW.DE) at 2.21%. This indicates that SADU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADU.DE | XZEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 2.21% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 7.24% | +2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.43% | 24.30% | +1.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 18.19% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 18.19% | +1.58% |
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SADU.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XZEW.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADU.DE vs. XZEW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SADU.DE nor XZEW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SADU.DE and XZEW.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SADU.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SADU.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for XZEW.DE.
SADU.DE is categorized as ESG, while XZEW.DE is S&P 500. SADU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Selection P-Series 5% Issuer Capped Index, while XZEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SADU.DE and 0.17% for XZEW.DE.
Find the right allocation for SADU.DE and XZEW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer