PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) and Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (FRNH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SADU.DE achieves a 14.89% return, which is significantly higher than FRNH.DE's 1.45% return.


SADU.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.13%
6M
13.55%
YTD
14.89%
1Y
26.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FRNH.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.36%
YTD
1.45%
1Y
2.88%
3Y*
3.81%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
1.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SADU.DE
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc
14.89%2.73%27.24%3.86%
FRNH.DE
Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
1.45%2.90%4.99%1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between SADU.DE and FRNH.DE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.13

The correlation between SADU.DE and FRNH.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SADU.DE
SADU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SADU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SADU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SADU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SADU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
SADU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

FRNH.DE
FRNH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FRNH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) and Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (FRNH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SADU.DEFRNH.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.88

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

8.02

-6.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

38.83

-36.17

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SADU.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the FRNH.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SADU.DE and FRNH.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SADU.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, which is greater than FRNH.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADU.DE and FRNH.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SADU.DEFRNH.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.85%

-15.25%

-8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.24%

-0.36%

-18.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-0.02%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-0.87%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.02%

0.07%

+9.95%

Volatility

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Amundi USD Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (FRNH.DE) at 0.11%. This indicates that SADU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRNH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SADU.DEFRNH.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

0.11%

+3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

0.53%

+9.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.58%

0.90%

+24.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.67%

2.42%

+17.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.67%

3.36%

+16.31%

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SADU.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FRNH.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SADU.DE vs. FRNH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SADU.DE nor FRNH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SADU.DE and FRNH.DE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SADU.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SADU.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FRNH.DE.

SADU.DE is categorized as ESG, while FRNH.DE is Corporate Bonds. SADU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Selection P-Series 5% Issuer Capped Index, while FRNH.DE tracks iBoxx MSCI ESG USD FRN Investment Grade Corporates Index (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SADU.DE and 0.20% for FRNH.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SADU.DE and FRNH.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer