SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE
SADU.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc) and 4UBQ.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SADU.DE is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Selection P-Series 5% Issuer Capped Index, while 4UBQ.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SADU.DE returned 29.06% vs 29.46% for 4UBQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SADU.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 4UBQ.DE.
Performance
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SADU.DE achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly higher than 4UBQ.DE's 12.38% return.
SADU.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 14.70%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- 29.06%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
4UBQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.09%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 12.79%
- 1Y
- 29.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.96%
- 10Y*
- —
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SADU.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc | 14.70% | 2.73% | 27.24% | 3.86% |
4UBQ.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 12.38% | 5.39% | 31.02% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADU.DE and 4UBQ.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SADU.DE and 4UBQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SADU.DE
4UBQ.DE
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SADU.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 4.27 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.90 | 16.39 | -13.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADU.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.85%, roughly equal to the maximum 4UBQ.DE drawdown of -23.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADU.DE and 4UBQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADU.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.85% | -23.35% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.24% | -6.93% | -12.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.17% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.05% | -3.96% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.02% | 1.80% | +8.22% |
Volatility
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI USA ESG Selection UCITS ETF Acc (SADU.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (4UBQ.DE) at 3.37%. This indicates that SADU.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 4UBQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADU.DE | 4UBQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 3.37% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.45% | 8.03% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.43% | 11.88% | +13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 15.33% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 15.49% | +4.28% |
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SADU.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADU.DE vs. 4UBQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SADU.DE nor 4UBQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SADU.DE and 4UBQ.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 4UBQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
4UBQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SADU.DE.
SADU.DE is categorized as ESG, while 4UBQ.DE is S&P 500. SADU.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Selection P-Series 5% Issuer Capped Index, while 4UBQ.DE tracks S&P 500 ESG. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SADU.DE and 0.10% for 4UBQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for SADU.DE and 4UBQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer