SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE
SADM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF) and LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - SADM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped, while LYP6.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SADM.DE returned 4.21%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for LYP6.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SADM.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for LYP6.DE.
Performance
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SADM.DE achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than LYP6.DE's 7.48% return.
SADM.DE
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 7.48%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SADM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF | 13.18% | 18.73% | 12.63% | 0.17% | -15.44% | 6.79% | 18.80% |
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 7.48% | 20.82% | 8.25% | 15.97% | -10.40% | 24.81% | 12.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADM.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SADM.DE and LYP6.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SADM.DE
LYP6.DE
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SADM.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.74 | +1.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 6.63 | +3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SADM.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.28 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.67 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.56 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADM.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.30%, smaller than the maximum LYP6.DE drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADM.DE and LYP6.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADM.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.30% | -35.51% | +8.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -9.45% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -16.26% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -20.71% | -5.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -1.62% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -4.84% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.49% | +0.44% |
Volatility
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.86% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.35%. This indicates that SADM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADM.DE | LYP6.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 4.35% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 10.65% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 12.90% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 14.41% | +2.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 15.86% | +1.11% |
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SADM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADM.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SADM.DE nor LYP6.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SADM.DE and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SADM.DE.
SADM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while LYP6.DE is Europe Equities. SADM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for SADM.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.
Find the right allocation for SADM.DE and LYP6.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer