SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE
SADM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF) and EUNM.DE (iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - SADM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped while EUNM.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SADM.DE returned 4.21%/yr vs 8.41%/yr for EUNM.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.
Performance
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SADM.DE achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly lower than EUNM.DE's 27.21% return.
SADM.DE
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.48%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- —
EUNM.DE
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 6M
- 29.18%
- 1Y
- 49.64%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SADM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF | 13.18% | 18.73% | 12.63% | 0.17% | -15.44% | 6.79% | 18.80% |
EUNM.DE iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) | 27.21% | 19.18% | 14.09% | 5.71% | -14.47% | 4.68% | 20.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADM.DE and EUNM.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SADM.DE and EUNM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SADM.DE
EUNM.DE
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SADM.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.50 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 4.72 | -1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 17.07 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SADM.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 2.78 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.50 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.39 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADM.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.30%, smaller than the maximum EUNM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADM.DE and EUNM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADM.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.30% | -35.91% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | -10.46% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.93% | -19.01% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.42% | -23.62% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.17% | -2.61% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -10.55% | -0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.90% | +0.03% |
Volatility
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging ESG Leaders - UCITS ETF (SADM.DE) is 5.86%, while iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that SADM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUNM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADM.DE | EUNM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 7.30% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 14.98% | -1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.94% | 17.80% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.88% | 16.70% | +0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 18.19% | -1.22% |
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SADM.DE and EUNM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADM.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SADM.DE nor EUNM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SADM.DE and EUNM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SADM.DE and EUNM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.
SADM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped, while EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.
Find the right allocation for SADM.DE and EUNM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer