SADA.L vs. ANXU.L
SADA.L (Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)) and ANXU.L (Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD) are both exchange-traded funds - SADA.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while ANXU.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SADA.L returned 14.62%/yr vs 28.16%/yr for ANXU.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SADA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for ANXU.L.
Performance
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SADA.L achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 19.66% return.
SADA.L
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- 40.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ANXU.L
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 40.52%
- 3Y*
- 28.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.78%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SADA.L Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 17.66% | 25.43% | 8.02% | -3.62% | -23.16% | -7.30% |
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 19.66% | 19.86% | 26.74% | 56.50% | -33.24% | 4.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between SADA.L and ANXU.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.44 |
The correlation between SADA.L and ANXU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Financial Services
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Cyclical
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Industrials
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Healthcare
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Communication Services
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Consumer Defensive
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Basic Materials
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Real Estate
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Utilities
SADA.L
ANXU.L
Energy
SADA.L
-
ANXU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SADA.L
ANXU.L
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SADA.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.44 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 3.66 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 13.14 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SADA.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 2.54 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 1.19 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SADA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADA.L and ANXU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SADA.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -35.13% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -11.01% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.64% | -22.45% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -0.77% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -5.77% | -13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 3.08% | +3.67% |
Volatility
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) at 5.03%. This indicates that SADA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SADA.L | ANXU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 5.03% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 11.93% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.33% | 15.91% | +5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.66% | 20.79% | +4.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.66% | 21.15% | +4.51% |
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SADA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison
SADA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANXU.L Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SADA.L Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.34% | 1.58% | 1.54% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SADA.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SADA.L.
SADA.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. SADA.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SADA.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.
Find the right allocation for SADA.L and ANXU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer