PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SADA.L vs. ANXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SADA.L achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly lower than ANXU.L's 19.66% return.


SADA.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
3.65%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.58%
1Y
40.73%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
10Y*

ANXU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
8.51%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.27%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
28.16%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*
21.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SADA.L
Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)
17.66%25.43%8.02%-3.62%-23.16%-7.30%
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
19.66%19.86%26.74%56.50%-33.24%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SADA.L and ANXU.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021

0.44

The correlation between SADA.L and ANXU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SADA.L
ANXU.L

Technology

44.3%
53.7%

Financial Services

12.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
12.2%

Industrials

8.7%
3.1%

Healthcare

6.8%
4.2%

Communication Services

5.1%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
7.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.1%

Real Estate

2.7%
0.1%

Utilities

1.6%
1.4%

Energy

-

0.6%

Technology

SADA.L
44.3%
ANXU.L
53.7%

Financial Services

SADA.L
12.7%
ANXU.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SADA.L
9.5%
ANXU.L
12.2%

Industrials

SADA.L
8.7%
ANXU.L
3.1%

Healthcare

SADA.L
6.8%
ANXU.L
4.2%

Communication Services

SADA.L
5.1%
ANXU.L
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

SADA.L
5.0%
ANXU.L
7.7%

Basic Materials

SADA.L
3.5%
ANXU.L
1.1%

Real Estate

SADA.L
2.7%
ANXU.L
0.1%

Utilities

SADA.L
1.6%
ANXU.L
1.4%

Energy

SADA.L

-

ANXU.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SADA.L
SADA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SADA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SADA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SADA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SADA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SADA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

ANXU.L
ANXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SADA.LANXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.44

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

3.66

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

13.14

+1.38

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SADA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is comparable to the ANXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SADA.L and ANXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SADA.LANXU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

2.54

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

1.19

-1.07

Drawdowns

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SADA.L drawdown since its inception was -38.76%, which is greater than ANXU.L's maximum drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SADA.L and ANXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SADA.LANXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.76%

-35.13%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-11.01%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.64%

-22.45%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-0.77%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-5.77%

-13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.75%

3.08%

+3.67%

Volatility

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D) (SADA.L) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD (ANXU.L) at 5.03%. This indicates that SADA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SADA.LANXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.33%

5.03%

+2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

11.93%

+3.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

15.91%

+5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.66%

20.79%

+4.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.66%

21.15%

+4.51%

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SADA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ANXU.L's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SADA.L vs. ANXU.L - Dividend Comparison

SADA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, while ANXU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ANXU.L
Amundi Nasdaq-100 UCITS USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SADA.L
Amundi Index MSCI EM Asia SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.34%1.58%1.54%1.63%1.66%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


SADA.L and ANXU.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANXU.L is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANXU.L is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SADA.L.

SADA.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ANXU.L is Nasdaq-100. SADA.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while ANXU.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SADA.L and 0.13% for ANXU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SADA.L and ANXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer