PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SABTX vs. FALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SABTX vs. FALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, SABTX has underperformed FALIX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while FALIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.12% annualized return.


SABTX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.83%
YTD
16.42%
6M
19.52%
1Y
36.58%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
11.38%

FALIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
12.71%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
14.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SABTX vs. FALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SABTX
SA U.S. Value Fund
16.42%17.69%11.32%11.82%-6.35%27.06%-2.04%24.85%-12.14%18.45%
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
0.00%19.65%26.36%23.49%-7.91%25.81%8.85%31.71%-8.42%16.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SABTX and FALIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2000

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between SABTX and FALIX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SABTX vs. FALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SABTX
SABTX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SABTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SABTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FALIX
FALIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SABTX vs. FALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SABTXFALIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.57

1.91

+1.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.03

2.67

+2.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.51

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.64

6.07

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.40

11.02

+13.38

SABTX vs. FALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SABTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is higher than the FALIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SABTX and FALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SABTXFALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

1.91

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.77

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.77

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.48

-0.11

Drawdowns

SABTX vs. FALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SABTX drawdown since its inception was -66.96%, which is greater than FALIX's maximum drawdown of -62.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SABTX and FALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SABTXFALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.96%

-62.37%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-5.03%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.63%

-18.89%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

-21.48%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.00%

-37.51%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.17%

+4.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-13.28%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

2.77%

-1.04%

Volatility

SABTX vs. FALIX - Volatility Comparison

SA U.S. Value Fund (SABTX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I (FALIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that SABTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SABTXFALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

0.00%

+2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

4.22%

+4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

8.08%

+3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

16.44%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.17%

18.58%

+0.59%

SABTX vs. FALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SABTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FALIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

SABTX vs. FALIX - Dividend Comparison

SABTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than FALIX's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FALIX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class I
5.86%5.86%6.10%3.43%2.28%6.51%5.39%8.35%16.78%6.13%2.25%3.16%
SABTX
SA U.S. Value Fund
3.33%3.88%2.60%1.67%7.66%4.25%1.52%5.14%9.80%10.36%5.08%6.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


SABTX and FALIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SABTX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to FALIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SABTX dropped -66.96% vs FALIX's -62.37%.

SABTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SABTX and FALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer