PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAB.MC vs. TSLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAB.MC is traded in EUR, while TSLA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TSLA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SAB.MC having a -4.89% return and TSLA slightly higher at -4.66%. Over the past 10 years, SAB.MC has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 11.81%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 39.75% annualized return.


SAB.MC

1D
0.50%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-4.89%
6M
0.96%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
54.69%
5Y*
44.05%
10Y*
11.81%

TSLA

1D
0.21%
1M
8.72%
YTD
-4.66%
6M
-4.64%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
17.33%
10Y*
39.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SAB.MC
Banco de Sabadell S.A
-4.89%92.34%77.23%31.30%56.27%67.18%-64.74%8.42%-37.11%28.28%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
-4.66%-1.85%73.25%95.67%-62.86%60.96%673.92%28.54%11.91%27.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SAB.MC and TSLA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAB.MC vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAB.MC
SAB.MC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SAB.MC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAB.MC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLA
TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAB.MCTSLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.11

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

0.70

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

1.63

+1.61

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAB.MC Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAB.MC and TSLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAB.MCTSLADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.45

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.30

+0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.68

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.74

-0.65

Drawdowns

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAB.MC drawdown since its inception was -93.84%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -71.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAB.MC and TSLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAB.MCTSLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.84%

-71.11%

-22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.67%

-29.45%

+15.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.45%

-56.79%

+37.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.02%

-71.11%

+34.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.19%

-71.11%

-14.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.16%

-20.19%

+12.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.98%

-22.76%

-26.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.82%

12.79%

-6.97%

Volatility

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco de Sabadell S.A (SAB.MC) is 8.40%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 11.73%. This indicates that SAB.MC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAB.MCTSLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.40%

11.73%

-3.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.70%

26.93%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.52%

46.29%

-17.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.19%

58.42%

-22.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.60%

59.06%

-17.46%

Dividends

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

SAB.MC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.36%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SAB.MC
Banco de Sabadell S.A
18.36%6.36%4.75%3.64%4.60%0.00%4.58%2.69%5.67%2.45%4.13%1.90%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAB.MC vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Banco de Sabadell S.A and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SAB.MC values in EUR, TSLA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SAB.MC and TSLA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAB.MC and TSLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer