PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAAA.L is traded in GBP, while AGHG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AGHG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAAA.L achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than AGHG.L's 0.55% return.


SAAA.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.21%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
1.29%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*
0.39%

AGHG.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.77%
1Y
3.23%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.29%2.96%-3.46%2.32%-5.93%
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
0.55%4.58%2.41%5.75%-4.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SAAA.L and AGHG.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2022

0.56

The correlation between SAAA.L and AGHG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAAA.L
SAAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AGHG.L
AGHG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGHG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) and Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAAA.LAGHG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.50

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.74

4.24

-2.50

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAAA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the AGHG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAAA.L and AGHG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAAA.LAGHG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.17

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.50

-0.38

Drawdowns

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAAA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, which is greater than AGHG.L's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAAA.L and AGHG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAAA.LAGHG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.70%

-6.65%

-18.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-2.24%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.68%

-4.02%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.59%

-1.02%

-17.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.88%

-1.70%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.78%

+0.97%

Volatility

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SAAA.L) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D) (AGHG.L) at 1.23%. This indicates that SAAA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGHG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAAA.LAGHG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.23%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.45%

2.22%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

2.89%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

4.96%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.86%

4.96%

+2.90%

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SAAA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AGHG.L's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SAAA.L vs. AGHG.L - Dividend Comparison

SAAA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than AGHG.L's 2.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGHG.L
Amundi Index Global Aggregate 500M UCITS ETF DR - Hedged GBP (D)
2.97%2.98%2.78%2.54%2.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAAA.L
iShares Global AAA-AA Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.68%2.48%2.34%1.57%0.76%0.48%0.61%0.89%0.87%0.81%0.83%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SAAA.L and AGHG.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AGHG.L is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AGHG.L is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SAAA.L.

SAAA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while AGHG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SAAA.L and 0.08% for AGHG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAAA.L and AGHG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer