S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L
S7XP.L (Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - S7XP.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L returned 15.50%/yr vs 27.22%/yr for XLKQ.L. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. S7XP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.
Performance
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.22% annualized return.
S7XP.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- 28.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.81%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- 1Y
- 54.52%
- 3Y*
- 33.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.60%
- 10Y*
- 27.22%
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF | 4.29% | 94.76% | 25.39% | 26.22% | 6.71% | 30.03% | -18.68% | 10.65% | -30.92% | 19.01% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 23.81% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.63% | 0.92% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between S7XP.L and XLKQ.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2014 | 0.31 |
The correlation between S7XP.L and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S7XP.L
XLKQ.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
S7XP.L
XLKQ.L
Basic Materials
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Communication Services
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Consumer Defensive
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Energy
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Healthcare
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Industrials
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
Real Estate
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Technology
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
Utilities
S7XP.L
-
XLKQ.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
S7XP.L
XLKQ.L
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S7XP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.24 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 8.42 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S7XP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.83 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.21 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 1.33 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.33 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and XLKQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S7XP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -28.74% | -34.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.10% | -16.76% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | -28.74% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -28.74% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.98% | -28.74% | -34.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -2.84% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -5.04% | -14.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 6.45% | -1.25% |
Volatility
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) have volatilities of 6.49% and 6.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S7XP.L | XLKQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 6.83% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 14.29% | +4.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 19.18% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 22.04% | +3.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 21.65% | +6.27% |
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S7XP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
S7XP.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S7XP.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S7XP.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKQ.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKQ.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.
S7XP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for S7XP.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
Find the right allocation for S7XP.L and XLKQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer