S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L
S7XP.L (Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) and IUFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Financials Equities funds - S7XP.L tracks the MSCI World/Financials NR USD while IUFS.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L returned 15.50%/yr vs 13.04%/yr for IUFS.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S7XP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IUFS.L.
Performance
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
S7XP.L is traded in GBp, while IUFS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUFS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than IUFS.L's -4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L has outperformed IUFS.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while IUFS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.04% annualized return.
S7XP.L
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 41.95%
- 3Y*
- 44.34%
- 5Y*
- 28.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
IUFS.L
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- -4.67%
- 6M
- -2.72%
- 1Y
- 4.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S7XP.L Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF | 4.29% | 94.76% | 25.39% | 26.22% | 6.71% | 30.03% | -18.68% | 10.65% | -30.92% | 19.01% |
IUFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc | -4.67% | 6.85% | 32.50% | 6.52% | -0.46% | 37.57% | -6.17% | 26.22% | -9.29% | 12.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between S7XP.L and IUFS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015 | 0.56 |
The correlation between S7XP.L and IUFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S7XP.L
IUFS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
S7XP.L
IUFS.L
Basic Materials
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Communication Services
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Energy
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Healthcare
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Industrials
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
Real Estate
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Technology
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
Utilities
S7XP.L
-
IUFS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
S7XP.L
IUFS.L
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S7XP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.06 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.34 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 0.82 | +7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S7XP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 0.30 | +1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.49 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.62 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.59 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than IUFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and IUFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S7XP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.98% | -35.96% | -27.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.10% | -13.28% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | -18.90% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.01% | -18.90% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.98% | -35.96% | -27.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -6.64% | +4.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -6.09% | -13.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 5.52% | -0.32% |
Volatility
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) at 4.58%. This indicates that S7XP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S7XP.L | IUFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 4.58% | +1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 11.57% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.31% | 15.11% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.83% | 18.53% | +7.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 20.96% | +6.96% |
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S7XP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S7XP.L nor IUFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S7XP.L and IUFS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IUFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IUFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.
S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for S7XP.L and 0.15% for IUFS.L.
Find the right allocation for S7XP.L and IUFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer