PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

S7XP.L is traded in GBp, while IUFS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUFS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than IUFS.L's -4.67% return. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L has outperformed IUFS.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while IUFS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.04% annualized return.


S7XP.L

1D
0.77%
1M
6.44%
YTD
4.29%
6M
10.76%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
44.34%
5Y*
28.16%
10Y*
15.50%

IUFS.L

1D
3.18%
1M
2.14%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-2.72%
1Y
4.53%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S7XP.L
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
4.29%94.76%25.39%26.22%6.71%30.03%-18.68%10.65%-30.92%19.01%
IUFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
-4.67%6.85%32.50%6.52%-0.46%37.57%-6.17%26.22%-9.29%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between S7XP.L and IUFS.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.56

The correlation between S7XP.L and IUFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S7XP.L
IUFS.L

Financial Services

100.0%
98.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

S7XP.L
100.0%
IUFS.L
98.0%

Basic Materials

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Communication Services

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Energy

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Healthcare

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Industrials

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L
0.2%

Real Estate

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Technology

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L
1.7%

Utilities

S7XP.L

-

IUFS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S7XP.L
S7XP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IUFS.L
IUFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IUFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S7XP.LIUFS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.06

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

0.34

+2.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

0.82

+7.23

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is higher than the IUFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S7XP.L and IUFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S7XP.LIUFS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

0.30

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.49

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.62

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.59

-0.23

Drawdowns

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than IUFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and IUFS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S7XP.LIUFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.98%

-35.96%

-27.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.10%

-13.28%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-18.90%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-18.90%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.98%

-35.96%

-27.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-6.64%

+4.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-6.09%

-13.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

5.52%

-0.32%

Volatility

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (IUFS.L) at 4.58%. This indicates that S7XP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S7XP.LIUFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

4.58%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

11.57%

+7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

15.11%

+8.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

18.53%

+7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.92%

20.96%

+6.96%

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S7XP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

S7XP.L vs. IUFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S7XP.L nor IUFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


S7XP.L and IUFS.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for S7XP.L.

S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while IUFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for S7XP.L and 0.15% for IUFS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S7XP.L and IUFS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer