PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

S7XP.L is traded in GBp, while EQQU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EQQU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S7XP.L achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than EQQU.L's 20.83% return. Over the past 10 years, S7XP.L has underperformed EQQU.L with an annualized return of 15.50%, while EQQU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.18% annualized return.


S7XP.L

1D
0.77%
1M
6.44%
YTD
4.29%
6M
10.76%
1Y
41.95%
3Y*
44.34%
5Y*
28.16%
10Y*
15.50%

EQQU.L

1D
0.00%
1M
10.21%
YTD
20.83%
6M
19.00%
1Y
42.53%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
19.02%
10Y*
22.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S7XP.L
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
4.29%94.76%25.39%26.22%6.71%30.03%-18.68%10.65%-30.92%19.01%
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
20.03%11.22%28.75%48.45%-25.54%29.16%43.42%31.96%4.16%19.64%

Correlation

The correlation between S7XP.L and EQQU.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2015

0.33

The correlation between S7XP.L and EQQU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (3 years) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S7XP.L
EQQU.L

Financial Services

100.0%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.6%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Technology

-

57.9%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Financial Services

S7XP.L
100.0%
EQQU.L
0.2%

Basic Materials

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
1.0%

Communication Services

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
6.6%

Energy

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
0.5%

Healthcare

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
3.7%

Industrials

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
2.8%

Real Estate

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
0.0%

Technology

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
57.9%

Utilities

S7XP.L

-

EQQU.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S7XP.L
S7XP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
S7XP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQU.L
EQQU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S7XP.LEQQU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

3.81

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

10.77

-2.72

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S7XP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the EQQU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S7XP.L and EQQU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S7XP.LEQQU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.68

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.95

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

1.10

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.99

-0.63

Drawdowns

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S7XP.L drawdown since its inception was -62.98%, which is greater than EQQU.L's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S7XP.L and EQQU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S7XP.LEQQU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.98%

-27.75%

-35.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.10%

-11.12%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-24.26%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.01%

-27.75%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.98%

-27.75%

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

0.00%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-5.38%

-13.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.20%

3.94%

+1.26%

Volatility

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (S7XP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQU.L) at 4.88%. This indicates that S7XP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S7XP.LEQQU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.49%

4.88%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.61%

11.61%

+7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

15.81%

+7.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

20.03%

+5.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.92%

20.15%

+7.77%

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both S7XP.L and EQQU.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

S7XP.L vs. EQQU.L - Dividend Comparison

S7XP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
EQQU.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.26%0.11%
S7XP.L
Invesco EURO STOXX Optimised Banks UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


S7XP.L and EQQU.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S7XP.L and EQQU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

S7XP.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while EQQU.L is Nasdaq-100. S7XP.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while EQQU.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S7XP.L and EQQU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer