PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S600.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S600.L achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.86% return. Over the past 10 years, S600.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 10.10%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.47% annualized return.


S600.L

1D
0.63%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.62%
6M
8.86%
1Y
19.13%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
10.10%

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
8.17%
YTD
19.86%
6M
17.66%
1Y
40.85%
3Y*
24.65%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
22.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S600.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
6.62%26.17%3.70%13.14%-4.95%16.44%3.69%20.15%-9.75%15.24%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.86%11.54%28.55%47.79%-25.54%29.59%43.32%33.69%4.64%20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between S600.L and EQQQ.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.62

The correlation between S600.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S600.L
EQQQ.L

Financial Services

23.7%
0.2%

Industrials

20.2%
2.8%

Healthcare

12.6%
3.7%

Technology

8.4%
57.9%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
11.6%

Energy

5.7%
0.5%

Basic Materials

5.5%
1.0%

Utilities

4.9%
1.2%

Communication Services

3.0%
14.5%

Real Estate

1.2%
0.0%

Financial Services

S600.L
23.7%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Industrials

S600.L
20.2%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Healthcare

S600.L
12.6%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Technology

S600.L
8.4%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Consumer Defensive

S600.L
8.1%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

S600.L
6.8%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Energy

S600.L
5.7%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Basic Materials

S600.L
5.5%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Utilities

S600.L
4.9%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Communication Services

S600.L
3.0%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Real Estate

S600.L
1.2%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S600.L
S600.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
S600.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S600.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
S600.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
S600.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
S600.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S600.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

3.78

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.60

11.13

-4.53

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S600.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S600.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S600.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

2.82

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.99

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

1.16

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.92

-0.34

Drawdowns

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S600.L drawdown since its inception was -30.21%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -33.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S600.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S600.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.21%

-33.75%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-10.97%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.53%

-24.09%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.04%

-27.76%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.21%

-27.76%

-2.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.63%

-0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.30%

-5.61%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

3.73%

-0.83%

Volatility

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF (S600.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S600.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.15%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

10.33%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.08%

14.70%

-2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

19.14%

-5.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.86%

19.35%

-4.49%

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S600.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

S600.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

S600.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
S600.L
Invesco STOXX Europe 600 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


S600.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S600.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S600.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

S600.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. S600.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for S600.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S600.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer