S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L
S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) and XS2D.L (Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - S5SD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while XS2D.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, S5SD.L returned 14.06%/yr vs 19.19%/yr for XS2D.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. S5SD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XS2D.L.
Performance
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
S5SD.L is traded in GBp, while XS2D.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XS2D.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S5SD.L achieves a 9.36% return, which is significantly lower than XS2D.L's 17.14% return.
S5SD.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 9.36%
- 1Y
- 22.68%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- —
XS2D.L
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 37.73%
- 3Y*
- 32.04%
- 5Y*
- 19.19%
- 10Y*
- 23.29%
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 9.36% | 9.98% | 26.33% | 21.21% | -8.47% | 33.83% | 14.91% | -10.18% |
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 17.14% | 17.56% | 48.20% | 41.43% | -31.85% | 64.57% | 17.41% | 30.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between S5SD.L and XS2D.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between S5SD.L and XS2D.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Financial Services
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Communication Services
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Healthcare
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Industrials
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Consumer Cyclical
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Consumer Defensive
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Energy
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
-
Real Estate
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Basic Materials
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Utilities
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L — Risk / Return Rank
S5SD.L
XS2D.L
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| S5SD.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.28 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.24 | 2.38 | +0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 8.62 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S5SD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.66%, smaller than the maximum XS2D.L drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5SD.L and XS2D.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S5SD.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.66% | -54.44% | +24.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.97% | -15.77% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.45% | -36.46% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.45% | -37.20% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -2.41% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -8.12% | +2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 4.36% | -2.51% |
Volatility
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) is 3.01%, while Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XS2D.L) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that S5SD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XS2D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S5SD.L | XS2D.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 5.47% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.90% | 17.88% | -9.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 23.63% | -12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 30.26% | -15.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 31.29% | -13.18% |
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S5SD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XS2D.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
S5SD.L vs. XS2D.L - Dividend Comparison
S5SD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while XS2D.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 0.75% | 0.91% | 0.91% | 1.16% | 1.22% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 0.42% |
XS2D.L Xtrackers S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
S5SD.L and XS2D.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XS2D.L.
S5SD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while XS2D.L is Leveraged Equities. S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while XS2D.L tracks S&P 500 2x Leveraged Daily Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S5SD.L and 0.60% for XS2D.L.
Find the right allocation for S5SD.L and XS2D.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer