PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) and IDUS.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both S&P 500 funds - S5SD.L tracks the S&P 500 Index while IDUS.L tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, S5SD.L returned 30.12% vs 29.08% for IDUS.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. S5SD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IDUS.L.

Performance

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

S5SD.L is traded in GBp, while IDUS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S5SD.L achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly lower than IDUS.L's 10.77% return.

S5SD.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.04%
YTD
9.02%
6M
9.50%
1Y
30.12%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

IDUS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.43%
YTD
10.77%
6M
10.36%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
S5SD.L
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis		9.02%27.97%
IDUS.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing		10.77%26.05%

Correlation

The correlation between S5SD.L and IDUS.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.86

The correlation between S5SD.L and IDUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
S5SD.L
IDUS.L

Technology

38.6%
38.3%

Communication Services

14.5%
10.6%

Financial Services

12.0%
11.2%

Healthcare

9.3%
8.3%

Industrials

6.8%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
9.7%

Energy

4.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.7%

Utilities

0.8%
2.6%

Technology

S5SD.L
38.6%
IDUS.L
38.3%

Communication Services

S5SD.L
14.5%
IDUS.L
10.6%

Financial Services

S5SD.L
12.0%
IDUS.L
11.2%

Healthcare

S5SD.L
9.3%
IDUS.L
8.3%

Industrials

S5SD.L
6.8%
IDUS.L
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

S5SD.L
5.1%
IDUS.L
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

S5SD.L
4.6%
IDUS.L
9.7%

Energy

S5SD.L
4.2%
IDUS.L
3.3%

Real Estate

S5SD.L
2.2%
IDUS.L
1.8%

Basic Materials

S5SD.L
1.9%
IDUS.L
1.7%

Utilities

S5SD.L
0.8%
IDUS.L
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis

iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing

Often compared with S5SD.L:
S5SD.L vs. EEDG.LS5SD.L vs. XZSP.DES5SD.L vs. VUSA.LS5SD.L vs. UC99.LS5SD.L vs. SPPY.DES5SD.L vs. SUUS.LS5SD.L vs. XZMU.DE
Often compared with IDUS.L:
IDUS.L vs. IUMS.LIDUS.L vs. IMSU.LIDUS.L vs. VUSD.LIDUS.L vs. CSPX.LIDUS.L vs. SPYL.LIDUS.L vs. CSPX.ASIDUS.L vs. IUUS.L

Return for Risk

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
S5SD.L
S5SD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5SD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
IDUS.L
IDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
IDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

S5SD.LIDUS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.89
2.43

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.93
3.30

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.45

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.13

4.03

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.94

13.69

+2.25

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S5SD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the IDUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S5SD.L and IDUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

S5SD.LIDUS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.43

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.97

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.97

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.09

0.70

+2.38

Drawdowns

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S5SD.L drawdown since its inception was -7.32%, smaller than the maximum IDUS.L drawdown of -35.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5SD.L and IDUS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

S5SD.LIDUS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-35.47%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-7.19%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-21.22%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-21.22%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.90%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.21%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.26%

-4.89%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.12%

-0.22%

Volatility

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) is 2.81%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing (IDUS.L) has a volatility of 3.46%. This indicates that S5SD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

S5SD.LIDUS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.46%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

8.60%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

11.91%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

15.46%

-3.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.47%

16.55%

-5.08%

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S5SD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IDUS.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

S5SD.L vs. IDUS.L - Dividend Comparison

S5SD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDUS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDUS.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Distributing		0.86%0.92%1.02%1.22%1.44%1.03%1.32%1.49%1.74%1.44%1.42%1.55%
S5SD.L
UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

S5SD.L and IDUS.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S5SD.L.

S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while IDUS.L tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S5SD.L and 0.07% for IDUS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S5SD.L and IDUS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer