S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L
S5SD.L (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis) and EUFM.L (UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - S5SD.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while EUFM.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, S5SD.L returned 30.12% vs 16.80% for EUFM.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S5SD.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for EUFM.L.
Performance
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S5SD.L achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than EUFM.L's 6.74% return.
S5SD.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 30.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUFM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 16.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.42%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- —
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
S5SD.L UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis | 9.02% | 27.97% |
EUFM.L UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc | 6.74% | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between S5SD.L and EUFM.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between S5SD.L and EUFM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Communication Services
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Financial Services
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Healthcare
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Industrials
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Consumer Defensive
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Consumer Cyclical
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Energy
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Real Estate
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Basic Materials
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Utilities
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L — Risk / Return Rank
S5SD.L
EUFM.L
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) and UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S5SD.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.26 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.13 | 1.58 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 5.69 | +10.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S5SD.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89 | 1.36 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.09 | 0.53 | +2.56 |
Drawdowns
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S5SD.L drawdown since its inception was -7.32%, smaller than the maximum EUFM.L drawdown of -30.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5SD.L and EUFM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S5SD.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -30.14% | +22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -10.59% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.07% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -5.19% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.95% | -1.05% |
Volatility
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF USD A-dis (S5SD.L) is 2.81%, while UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) has a volatility of 4.00%. This indicates that S5SD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EUFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S5SD.L | EUFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 4.00% | -1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.10% | 10.33% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 12.33% | -1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 14.53% | -3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.47% | 16.13% | -4.66% |
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S5SD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than EUFM.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
S5SD.L vs. EUFM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S5SD.L nor EUFM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S5SD.L and EUFM.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5SD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5SD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EUFM.L.
S5SD.L is categorized as S&P 500, while EUFM.L is Europe Equities. S5SD.L tracks S&P 500 Index, while EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S5SD.L and 0.34% for EUFM.L.
Find the right allocation for S5SD.L and EUFM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer