PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis (S5SD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S5SD.DE achieves a 11.01% return, which is significantly higher than MDBA.DE's 1.20% return.


S5SD.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
4.13%
YTD
11.01%
6M
10.95%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
15.39%
10Y*

MDBA.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.20%
6M
0.59%
1Y
1.94%
3Y*
1.12%
5Y*
1.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
S5SD.DE
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis
11.01%5.27%30.99%23.88%-13.99%43.50%8.08%2.71%
MDBA.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
1.20%-5.19%8.65%0.89%-1.84%6.67%-4.47%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between S5SD.DE and MDBA.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019

0.09

The correlation between S5SD.DE and MDBA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (5 years) to 0.21 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S5SD.DE
S5SD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
S5SD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S5SD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
S5SD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
S5SD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
S5SD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

MDBA.DE
MDBA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
MDBA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDBA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis (S5SD.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S5SD.DEMDBA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.05

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

0.43

+3.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.47

1.04

+14.42

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S5SD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the MDBA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S5SD.DE and MDBA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S5SD.DEMDBA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

0.31

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.26

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.24

+0.57

Drawdowns

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S5SD.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.97%, which is greater than MDBA.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S5SD.DE and MDBA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S5SD.DEMDBA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.97%

-12.17%

-20.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-3.81%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

-10.11%

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-12.02%

-11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.13%

+6.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-5.56%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.55%

+0.28%

Volatility

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis (S5SD.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (MDBA.DE) at 0.85%. This indicates that S5SD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDBA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S5SD.DEMDBA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

0.85%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.59%

3.65%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.51%

5.31%

+6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.26%

7.26%

+8.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

7.03%

+10.54%

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

S5SD.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MDBA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

S5SD.DE vs. MDBA.DE - Dividend Comparison

S5SD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, while MDBA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MDBA.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Sustainable Development Bank Bonds UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
S5SD.DE
UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis
0.63%0.86%0.82%1.05%1.21%0.82%1.33%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


S5SD.DE and MDBA.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S5SD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S5SD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MDBA.DE.

S5SD.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while MDBA.DE is Government Bonds. S5SD.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while MDBA.DE tracks Solactive UBS Global Multilateral Development Bank Bond USD 25% Issuer Capped. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S5SD.DE and 0.15% for MDBA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S5SD.DE and MDBA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer