PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S500.PA vs. SP5.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc EUR (S500.PA) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (SP5.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with S500.PA having a 11.06% return and SP5.PA slightly higher at 11.61%.


S500.PA

1D
0.59%
1M
5.50%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.57%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
15.54%
10Y*

SP5.PA

1D
-0.13%
1M
5.23%
YTD
11.61%
6M
11.49%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
15.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S500.PA
Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc EUR
11.06%4.58%33.45%23.34%-13.75%42.99%6.93%32.56%-1.91%5.79%
SP5.PA
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
11.61%4.06%34.08%22.28%-13.91%40.50%7.97%33.38%-0.25%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between S500.PA and SP5.PA is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2017

0.85

The correlation between S500.PA and SP5.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.85 (all time) to 0.97 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S500.PA
S500.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
S500.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S500.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
S500.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
S500.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
S500.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5.PA
SP5.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SP5.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc EUR (S500.PA) and Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (SP5.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S500.PASP5.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.42

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

3.60

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

12.87

+1.99

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S500.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the SP5.PA Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S500.PA and SP5.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S500.PASP5.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.23

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

0.97

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.92

+0.05

Drawdowns

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S500.PA drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, roughly equal to the maximum SP5.PA drawdown of -33.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S500.PA and SP5.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S500.PASP5.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-33.67%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-7.08%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-23.28%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.37%

-23.28%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.44%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.61%

-4.12%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.99%

-0.08%

Volatility

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Volatility Comparison

Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc EUR (S500.PA) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR (SP5.PA) at 2.64%. This indicates that S500.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SP5.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S500.PASP5.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.64%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

7.52%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.52%

11.42%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

15.18%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.16%

16.07%

+2.09%

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

S500.PA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5.PA's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

S500.PA vs. SP5.PA - Dividend Comparison

S500.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SP5.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
S500.PA
Amundi S&P 500 ESG UCITS ETF Acc EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SP5.PA
Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Dist EUR
0.89%1.00%1.20%1.05%2.12%1.09%1.55%1.64%1.93%1.76%1.89%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, S500.PA and SP5.PA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SP5.PA is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5.PA is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for S500.PA.

S500.PA tracks S&P 500 ESG+ Index, while SP5.PA tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for S500.PA and 0.05% for SP5.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S500.PA and SP5.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer