PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
S100.L vs. MVEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

S100.L vs. MVEU.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

S100.L (Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and MVEU.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - S100.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while MVEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S100.L returned 9.60%/yr vs 8.04%/yr for MVEU.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S100.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MVEU.L.

Performance

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

S100.L is traded in GBp, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S100.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than MVEU.L's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, S100.L has outperformed MVEU.L with an annualized return of 9.60%, while MVEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.

S100.L

1D
0.79%
1M
0.21%
YTD
7.81%
6M
8.58%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.60%

MVEU.L

1D
0.26%
1M
0.18%
YTD
6.38%
6M
6.68%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S100.L
Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF		7.81%25.76%9.34%7.33%4.91%17.58%-11.72%17.44%-8.31%10.86%
MVEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)		6.38%17.63%6.71%8.45%-8.16%14.46%1.57%15.47%-2.87%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between S100.L and MVEU.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.73

The correlation between S100.L and MVEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
S100.L
MVEU.L

Financial Services

25.0%
17.6%

Industrials

14.0%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
14.1%

Healthcare

13.3%
12.3%

Energy

10.8%
6.9%

Basic Materials

9.0%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
3.6%

Utilities

4.8%
10.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
9.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.5%

Technology

0.8%
3.4%

Financial Services

S100.L
25.0%
MVEU.L
17.6%

Industrials

S100.L
14.0%
MVEU.L
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

S100.L
13.8%
MVEU.L
14.1%

Healthcare

S100.L
13.3%
MVEU.L
12.3%

Energy

S100.L
10.8%
MVEU.L
6.9%

Basic Materials

S100.L
9.0%
MVEU.L
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

S100.L
5.0%
MVEU.L
3.6%

Utilities

S100.L
4.8%
MVEU.L
10.1%

Communication Services

S100.L
2.5%
MVEU.L
9.0%

Real Estate

S100.L
0.9%
MVEU.L
1.5%

Technology

S100.L
0.8%
MVEU.L
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)

Often compared with S100.L:
S100.L vs. VUKG.LS100.L vs. EQAC.MIS100.L vs. CUKX.LS100.L vs. LGUK.LS100.L vs. QQQS100.L vs. V3PL.DES100.L vs. VOO
Often compared with MVEU.L:
MVEU.L vs. SVOLMVEU.L vs. VTMVEU.L vs. FLXD.LMVEU.L vs. EUHD.LMVEU.L vs. CS1.LMVEU.L vs. CSP1.LMVEU.L vs. IITU.L

Return for Risk

S100.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
S100.L
S100.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
S100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
S100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
S100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
S100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
MVEU.L
MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

S100.LMVEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.18
1.33

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.00
1.84

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.24

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.42

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

4.19

+4.63

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S100.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S100.L and MVEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S100.L drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S100.L and MVEU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

S100.LMVEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.58%

-23.74%

-10.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-8.32%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-8.32%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.04%

-17.42%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-23.74%

-10.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-3.10%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-3.52%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.82%

-0.04%

Volatility

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) at 1.93%. This indicates that S100.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

S100.LMVEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

1.93%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

7.32%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.20%

8.92%

+2.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

11.28%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.95%

12.62%

+2.33%

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S100.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

S100.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S100.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

S100.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S100.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S100.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.

S100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for S100.L and 0.25% for MVEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S100.L and MVEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer