S100.L vs. LDEG.L
S100.L (Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and LDEG.L (L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - S100.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while LDEG.L tracks the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, S100.L returned 11.75%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for LDEG.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. S100.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEG.L.
Performance
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S100.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than LDEG.L's 10.41% return.
S100.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 21.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
LDEG.L
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 13.94%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 23.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S100.L Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 5.86% | 25.76% | 9.34% | 7.33% | 4.91% | 5.53% |
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 10.41% | 44.92% | 8.83% | 14.32% | 3.42% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between S100.L and LDEG.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between S100.L and LDEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S100.L
LDEG.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
S100.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Defensive
S100.L
LDEG.L
Industrials
S100.L
LDEG.L
Healthcare
S100.L
LDEG.L
Energy
S100.L
LDEG.L
Basic Materials
S100.L
LDEG.L
Utilities
S100.L
LDEG.L
Consumer Cyclical
S100.L
LDEG.L
Communication Services
S100.L
LDEG.L
Real Estate
S100.L
LDEG.L
-
Technology
S100.L
LDEG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S100.L vs. LDEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
S100.L
LDEG.L
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S100.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.48 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.78 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 13.82 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S100.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.63 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.24 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S100.L drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, which is greater than LDEG.L's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S100.L and LDEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S100.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.58% | -15.97% | -18.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -8.04% | -0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | -12.05% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.04% | -15.97% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -1.33% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -2.95% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 2.20% | +0.45% |
Volatility
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF (LDEG.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that S100.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S100.L | LDEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.57% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 9.21% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.96% | 11.55% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 15.99% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 16.01% | -0.92% |
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S100.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LDEG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
S100.L vs. LDEG.L - Dividend Comparison
S100.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEG.L L&G Quality Equity Dividends ESG Exclusions Europe ex-UK UCITS ETF | 3.13% | 3.43% | 4.21% | 4.11% | 3.70% | 3.11% |
S100.L Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
S100.L and LDEG.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S100.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S100.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LDEG.L.
S100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LDEG.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for S100.L and 0.25% for LDEG.L.
Find the right allocation for S100.L and LDEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer