PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
S100.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, S100.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, S100.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 8.88%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


S100.L

1D
0.30%
1M
1.64%
YTD
5.86%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
14.67%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
8.88%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
3.01%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.45%
1Y
27.63%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
10.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
S100.L
Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.86%25.76%9.34%7.33%4.91%17.58%-11.72%17.44%-9.33%12.12%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.88%-2.83%10.70%0.29%16.28%8.38%12.94%-2.26%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between S100.L and LCPE.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2015

0.37

Over the past year, S100.L and LCPE.L have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
S100.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

24.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
32.8%

Industrials

13.7%
0.2%

Healthcare

13.6%
32.6%

Energy

11.7%
0.0%

Basic Materials

8.5%
32.3%

Utilities

5.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.6%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.0%

Technology

0.8%
0.2%

Financial Services

S100.L
24.5%
LCPE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

S100.L
13.9%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Industrials

S100.L
13.7%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Healthcare

S100.L
13.6%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Energy

S100.L
11.7%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

S100.L
8.5%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Utilities

S100.L
5.3%
LCPE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

S100.L
4.7%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Communication Services

S100.L
2.6%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Real Estate

S100.L
0.9%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Technology

S100.L
0.8%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

S100.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

S100.L
S100.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
S100.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S100.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
S100.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
S100.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
S100.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


S100.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.43

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

4.13

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.00

13.66

-5.65

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current S100.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of S100.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


S100.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

2.44

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.04

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

1.20

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.98

-0.41

Drawdowns

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum S100.L drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S100.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


S100.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.58%

-27.05%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-6.66%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-12.39%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.04%

-12.39%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.58%

-27.05%

-7.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-2.71%

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.49%

-3.52%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.02%

+0.63%

Volatility

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


S100.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.81%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

8.48%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

11.29%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.78%

17.74%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.09%

20.60%

-5.51%

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

S100.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

S100.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither S100.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


S100.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, S100.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

S100.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

S100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for S100.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for S100.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer