S100.L vs. IEFV.L
S100.L (Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and IEFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - S100.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while IEFV.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, S100.L returned 9.60%/yr vs 12.59%/yr for IEFV.L. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. S100.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEFV.L.
Performance
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S100.L achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly lower than IEFV.L's 14.64% return. Over the past 10 years, S100.L has underperformed IEFV.L with an annualized return of 9.60%, while IEFV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.
S100.L
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.10%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.60%
IEFV.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 38.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S100.L Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF | 7.81% | 25.76% | 9.34% | 7.33% | 4.91% | 17.58% | -11.72% | 17.44% | -8.31% | 10.86% |
IEFV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 14.64% | 42.20% | 5.40% | 11.41% | 1.47% | 18.58% | -3.74% | 15.71% | -12.67% | 14.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between S100.L and IEFV.L is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015 | 0.84 |
The correlation between S100.L and IEFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
S100.L
IEFV.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
S100.L
IEFV.L
Industrials
S100.L
IEFV.L
Consumer Defensive
S100.L
IEFV.L
Healthcare
S100.L
IEFV.L
Energy
S100.L
IEFV.L
Basic Materials
S100.L
IEFV.L
Consumer Cyclical
S100.L
IEFV.L
Utilities
S100.L
IEFV.L
Communication Services
S100.L
IEFV.L
Real Estate
S100.L
IEFV.L
Technology
S100.L
IEFV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S100.L vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank
S100.L
IEFV.L
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| S100.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.53 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.65 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.82 | 13.42 | -4.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S100.L drawdown since its inception was -34.58%, roughly equal to the maximum IEFV.L drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S100.L and IEFV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S100.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.58% | -34.64% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -10.57% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | -15.02% | +1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.04% | -16.16% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.58% | -34.64% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | 0.00% | -2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -6.18% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 2.88% | -0.10% |
Volatility
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (S100.L) is 3.01%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that S100.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S100.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 3.84% | -0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 11.09% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 13.43% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 17.10% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 17.58% | -2.63% |
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
S100.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
S100.L vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither S100.L nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S100.L and IEFV.L have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S100.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S100.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.
S100.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for S100.L and 0.25% for IEFV.L.
Find the right allocation for S100.L and IEFV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer