S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE
S0LR.DE (Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc) and EQQX.DE (Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - S0LR.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy, while EQQX.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, S0LR.DE returned -3.99%/yr vs 25.43%/yr for EQQX.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. S0LR.DE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EQQX.DE.
Performance
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, S0LR.DE achieves a 39.14% return, which is significantly higher than EQQX.DE's 21.61% return.
S0LR.DE
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 15.39%
- YTD
- 39.14%
- 6M
- 44.58%
- 1Y
- 102.95%
- 3Y*
- -3.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQX.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 10.15%
- YTD
- 21.61%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 39.08%
- 3Y*
- 25.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.11%
- 10Y*
- —
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S0LR.DE Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 39.14% | 31.50% | -33.95% | -27.80% | 1.22% | -8.13% |
EQQX.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 21.61% | 7.13% | 33.88% | 51.62% | -29.90% | 13.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between S0LR.DE and EQQX.DE is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2021 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
S0LR.DE
EQQX.DE
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (S0LR.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| S0LR.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.71 | 3.91 | +4.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.79 | 11.64 | +10.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| S0LR.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02 | 2.49 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.90 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum S0LR.DE drawdown since its inception was -73.43%, which is greater than EQQX.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for S0LR.DE and EQQX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| S0LR.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.43% | -31.17% | -42.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -9.97% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.01% | -26.80% | -38.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.82% | 0.00% | -32.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.70% | -7.99% | -31.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 3.36% | +1.35% |
Volatility
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Solar Energy UCITS ETF Acc (S0LR.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQQX.DE) at 4.15%. This indicates that S0LR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| S0LR.DE | EQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.56% | 4.15% | +8.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.50% | 10.89% | +12.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.92% | 15.75% | +18.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.23% | 19.86% | +16.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.23% | 19.79% | +16.44% |
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
S0LR.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQX.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
S0LR.DE vs. EQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither S0LR.DE nor EQQX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
S0LR.DE and EQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EQQX.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQX.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for S0LR.DE.
S0LR.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EQQX.DE is Nasdaq-100. S0LR.DE tracks MAC Global Solar Energy, while EQQX.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for S0LR.DE and 0.20% for EQQX.DE.
Find the right allocation for S0LR.DE and EQQX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer