RZG vs. MMSC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC).
RZG and MMSC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RZG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Small Cap 600 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. MMSC is an actively managed fund by First Trust. It was launched on Oct 13, 2021.
Performance
RZG vs. MMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RZG vs. MMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 4.96% | 10.22% | 9.84% | 19.15% | -29.00% | 2.36% |
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | -0.98% | 15.45% | 22.19% | 18.76% | -30.98% | 1.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZG achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly higher than MMSC's -0.98% return.
RZG
- 1D
- 4.17%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- 22.42%
- 3Y*
- 14.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
MMSC
- 1D
- 4.82%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 30.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RZG vs. MMSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RZG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MMSC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RZG vs. MMSC — Risk / Return Rank
RZG
MMSC
RZG vs. MMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) and First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RZG | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.99 | 1.16 | -0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.70 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.05 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 7.28 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RZG | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.16 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.14 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between RZG and MMSC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RZG vs. MMSC - Dividend Comparison
RZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, while MMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RZG Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.37% | 0.95% | 1.43% | 1.59% | 0.22% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.65% | 0.70% |
MMSC First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RZG vs. MMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZG drawdown since its inception was -58.52%, which is greater than MMSC's maximum drawdown of -40.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZG and MMSC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZG | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.52% | -40.82% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.42% | -14.17% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -9.96% | +5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.22% | -19.44% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.98% | -0.77% |
Volatility
RZG vs. MMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Growth ETF (RZG) is 8.31%, while First Trust Multi-Manager Small Cap Opportunities ETF (MMSC) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that RZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RZG | MMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 10.00% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 18.07% | -4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.70% | 26.46% | -3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.09% | 24.54% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 24.54% | +0.08% |