RYWWX vs. UCPIX
RYWWX (Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund) and UCPIX (ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RYWWX returned -27.36%/yr vs -10.27%/yr for UCPIX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RYWWX charges 1.87%/yr vs 1.78%/yr for UCPIX.
Performance
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RYWWX achieves a -11.34% return, which is significantly higher than UCPIX's -32.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RYWWX has underperformed UCPIX with an annualized return of -27.36%, while UCPIX has yielded a comparatively higher -10.27% annualized return.
RYWWX
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- -11.34%
- 6M
- -11.27%
- 1Y
- -39.65%
- 3Y*
- -30.50%
- 5Y*
- -19.49%
- 10Y*
- -27.36%
UCPIX
- 1D
- -4.20%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- -32.53%
- 6M
- -28.20%
- 1Y
- -51.88%
- 3Y*
- 50.86%
- 5Y*
- 28.12%
- 10Y*
- -10.27%
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYWWX Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund | -11.34% | -51.31% | -17.03% | -28.06% | 2.55% | 17.09% | -57.70% | -39.99% | 23.02% | -47.98% |
UCPIX ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund | -32.53% | -25.76% | 707.30% | -26.54% | 28.08% | -36.02% | -60.58% | -38.99% | 17.86% | -27.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between RYWWX and UCPIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011 | 0.64 |
The correlation between RYWWX and UCPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RYWWX vs. UCPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RYWWX
UCPIX
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund (RYWWX) and ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund (UCPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RYWWX | UCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.77 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -1.00 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | -1.61 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RYWWX drawdown since its inception was -98.12%, roughly equal to the maximum UCPIX drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYWWX and UCPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RYWWX | UCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.12% | -99.90% | +1.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.32% | -50.82% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.97% | -68.01% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.06% | -68.01% | -16.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.66% | -94.03% | -2.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.87% | -99.48% | +1.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.68% | -83.99% | +15.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.45% | 32.04% | +1.41% |
Volatility
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund (RYWWX) has a higher volatility of 14.58% compared to ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund (UCPIX) at 13.54%. This indicates that RYWWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RYWWX | UCPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.58% | 13.54% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.57% | 28.85% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.55% | 39.39% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.01% | 400.09% | -352.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.61% | 284.66% | -238.05% |
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RYWWX has a 1.87% expense ratio, which is higher than UCPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
RYWWX vs. UCPIX - Dividend Comparison
RYWWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, less than UCPIX's 6.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYWWX Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund | 5.64% | 5.00% | 5.36% | 3.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.06% |
UCPIX ProFunds UltraShort Small Cap Fund | 6.84% | 4.61% | 4.24% | 4.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RYWWX and UCPIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RYWWX has higher volatility (14.58%) compared to UCPIX (13.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYWWX dropped -98.12% vs UCPIX's -99.90%.
RYWWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.90 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RYWWX and UCPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer